Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SVN 12223 and socketwrapper

2007-06-10 Thread bpa
I think you could determine if slim.exe is being run as a service from the Parent Process as most times it is svchost.exe but it is quite complex to to find the parent of a process. Rather than trying to detect all situations, why not make it an commandline option or preference to use/not use

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SVN 12223 and socketwrapper

2007-06-10 Thread Triode
Please try the latest trunk - svn 12227. I think I've found a way to prevent the cmd window without using socketwrapper. Assuming it works I hope this will keep everyone happy... -- Triode Triode's Profile:

[SlimDevices: Beta] SVN 12223 and socketwrapper

2007-06-09 Thread gharris999
The changes made to Source.pm in svn 12223 now cause socketwrapper to be run when the trunk source code is being run as a Windows service using srvany.exe. I think this may be the opposite of the intended effect, at least according to the comment in the new code: Description: this should only

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SVN 12223 and socketwrapper

2007-06-09 Thread Triode
See comments in the bug - I believe it was wrong, but we probably need a better way of detecting running as a service so it catches your case too Do you actually have a problem with the latest socketwrapper and flacs with embedded cues? -- Triode

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SVN 12223 and socketwrapper

2007-06-09 Thread JJZolx
I run using the same setup, the Perl code running as a service on Windows XP Pro using srvany.exe. If I transcode at the server then I see the same thing - socketwrapper being used. But I don't get a DOS box when this happens, so is there any real harm? -- JJZolx Jim