Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread Nathan Letwory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30.12.2010 9:48, Nathan Letwory wrote: On 29.12.2010 21:10, Ton Roosendaal wrote: SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag will be announced here too. Appologies for the slow tagging speed, but builders can now

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread pete larabell
FreeBSD i386 and amd64 are uploaded On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Nathan Letwory nat...@blender.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30.12.2010 9:48, Nathan Letwory wrote: On 29.12.2010 21:10, Ton Roosendaal wrote: SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread pete larabell
Sorry to sound so ignorant on my part, but: I've moved the binaries away already, thanks a lot! mean that BF has taken the latest builds from the ftp server, BF is taking it from here, and the builders are free to assume there wont be more revision changes for 2.56? Pete

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread Ton Roosendaal
Hi, I'm an optimist :) But it's also moved to allow you to put a new one there, might it be needed. -Ton- Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread kitt3n
I think you guys are doing an amazing job - but I'm wondering why this building isn't handled by an automated buildserver (maybe with some virtual machines for each of the targeted platforms)? The entire process to get these versions out seems very error-prone with long turn-around times...?

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread Thomas Dinges
The time and ressources needed for building/maintaining such an infrastructure is not worth the benefit. Our current process is much more flexible and proved to work well. :) Am 30.12.2010 17:44, schrieb kitt3n: I think you guys are doing an amazing job - but I'm wondering why this building

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread Ken Hughes
Linux tarballs on download.blender.org. Ken On 12/30/2010 12:50 AM, Nathan Letwory wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30.12.2010 9:48, Nathan Letwory wrote: On 29.12.2010 21:10, Ton Roosendaal wrote: SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread Onyeibo Oku
-- Message: 8 Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:28:47 -0800 From: Ken Hugheskhug...@pacific.edu Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY! To: bf-blender developersbf-committers@blender.org Message-ID:4d1cc14f.20...@pacific.edu Content-Type: text/plain;

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread Sean Olson
Same as building from svn. These are mostly because most people dont know how/dont have the time to build their own builds. This offers the software to the enduser in the format they are most used to on their respective systems. On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Onyeibo Oku twoho...@gmail.com

Re: [Bf-committers] [Bf-blender-cvs] SVN commit: /data/svn/bf-blender [33936] trunk/blender/source/blender/ blenkernel/intern: Silencing some compiler warnings (gcc)

2010-12-30 Thread Campbell Barton
What GCC version are you using? I dont get any warnings with either of these files: gcc version 4.5.2 warning flags: -Wunused-value -Wclobbered -Wold-style-declaration -Woverride-init -Wuninitialized -Winit-self -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wignored-qualifiers -Woverride-init -Werror -Wall