Congratulations on the release! Everything looks good, there seems to
be tons of great improvements,
and the reels are quite impressive.
However, I have noticed that Add-ons are treated differently in the
release notes. Judging by the emails from the bf-extensions mailing
list, many of the
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:51 PM Sybren A. Stüvel via Bf-committers
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 07:56, Campbell Barton via Bf-committers <
> bf-committers@blender.org> wrote:
>
> > If the proposed policies are followed to the letter, we end up in
> > situations where extra review iterations
I did a little bit of digging into GitLab and found out that they have a
special program for open source projects [1].
This gives access to their "Ultimate" tier for free and looks like
something we should look into.
Part of the program also includes migration support which will be
beneficial as
FYI, here is the (exhaustive and extensive) list of gitlab features,
with their support in free/premium/ultimate plans:
https://about.gitlab.com/features/
On 6/4/21 10:15 AM, Dalai Felinto via Bf-committers wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Which features you are referring to? CI/CD?
Thanks,
-Dalai-
I think most of these issues with be solved when we have CI bots?
In most bigger open source projects I contribute to, the bots makes sure
that everything is formated correctly and that there are no new
warning/errors in the code.
If there are any issues, they will post a comment pointing the
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 07:56, Campbell Barton via Bf-committers <
bf-committers@blender.org> wrote:
> If the proposed policies are followed to the letter, we end up in
> situations where extra review iterations would be required for running
> clang-format, stripping what-space and spelling
Hi Sebastian,
Which features you are referring to? CI/CD?
Thanks,
-Dalai-
Dalai Felinto - da...@blender.org - www.blender.org
Blender Development Coordinator
Buikslotermeerplein 161, 1025 ET Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Op do 3
