Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY! ** Collada crash on linux32 **

2011-01-03 Thread Jeroen Bakker
Ken, There is an issue with the 32 bit version of 2.56. I was wondering if you could help me with it. The bug is http://projects.blender.org/tracker/?func=detailaid=25463group_id=9atid=498 I have succesfully reproduced it on linux32, but am not able to reproduce it on linux64 or windows32.

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY! ** Collada crash on linux32 **

2011-01-03 Thread Ken Hughes
Crap: 32-bit was not build with r788 but r733. I'm rebuilding and will upload a new copy to download.blender.org/incoming in about 30 minutes. Ken On 01/03/2011 08:12 AM, Jeroen Bakker wrote: Ken, There is an issue with the 32 bit version of 2.56. I was wondering if you could help me with

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY! ** Collada crash on linux32 **

2011-01-03 Thread Ton Roosendaal
Hi, Reminder: Pending final pointcache tests, we'll call tomorrow for a 2.56a too. -Ton- Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY! ** Collada crash on linux32 **

2011-01-03 Thread Dave Plater
On 01/03/2011 06:12 PM, Jeroen Bakker wrote: Ken, There is an issue with the 32 bit version of 2.56. I was wondering if you could help me with it. The bug is http://projects.blender.org/tracker/?func=detailaid=25463group_id=9atid=498 I have succesfully reproduced it on linux32, but am

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY! ** Collada crash on linux32 **

2011-01-03 Thread Ken Hughes
I know; this was just in case we wanted a correct 2.56 build for linux 32-bit. Ken On 01/03/2011 09:35 AM, Ton Roosendaal wrote: Hi, Reminder: Pending final pointcache tests, we'll call tomorrow for a 2.56a too. -Ton-

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread Nathan Letwory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30.12.2010 9:48, Nathan Letwory wrote: On 29.12.2010 21:10, Ton Roosendaal wrote: SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag will be announced here too. Appologies for the slow tagging speed, but builders can now

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread pete larabell
FreeBSD i386 and amd64 are uploaded On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Nathan Letwory nat...@blender.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30.12.2010 9:48, Nathan Letwory wrote: On 29.12.2010 21:10, Ton Roosendaal wrote: SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread pete larabell
Sorry to sound so ignorant on my part, but: I've moved the binaries away already, thanks a lot! mean that BF has taken the latest builds from the ftp server, BF is taking it from here, and the builders are free to assume there wont be more revision changes for 2.56? Pete

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread Ton Roosendaal
Hi, I'm an optimist :) But it's also moved to allow you to put a new one there, might it be needed. -Ton- Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread kitt3n
I think you guys are doing an amazing job - but I'm wondering why this building isn't handled by an automated buildserver (maybe with some virtual machines for each of the targeted platforms)? The entire process to get these versions out seems very error-prone with long turn-around times...?

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread Thomas Dinges
The time and ressources needed for building/maintaining such an infrastructure is not worth the benefit. Our current process is much more flexible and proved to work well. :) Am 30.12.2010 17:44, schrieb kitt3n: I think you guys are doing an amazing job - but I'm wondering why this building

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread Ken Hughes
Linux tarballs on download.blender.org. Ken On 12/30/2010 12:50 AM, Nathan Letwory wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30.12.2010 9:48, Nathan Letwory wrote: On 29.12.2010 21:10, Ton Roosendaal wrote: SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread Onyeibo Oku
-- Message: 8 Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:28:47 -0800 From: Ken Hugheskhug...@pacific.edu Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY! To: bf-blender developersbf-committers@blender.org Message-ID:4d1cc14f.20...@pacific.edu Content-Type: text/plain

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-30 Thread Sean Olson
wrote: -- Message: 8 Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:28:47 -0800 From: Ken Hugheskhug...@pacific.edu Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY! To: bf-blender developersbf-committers@blender.org Message-ID:4d1cc14f.20...@pacific.edu Content-Type: text/plain

[Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread Ton Roosendaal
Hi all, Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do commits related to making the builds please. SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag will be announced here too.

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread pete larabell
Ton, I built r33942 on FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 and it using cmake and it does create 2.56 directory. what if BF's preferred method to package the files for upload? (last time I simply tar -cjf the contents of build-cmake/bin/ and uploaded .tbz, is that ok?) Thanks, Pete On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:10

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread Ton Roosendaal
Hi, Compression format you can choose freely, based on what FreeBSD users prefer. Make sure the binary is stripped, and make a release file name similar to the others; blender-2.56-beta-xxx.xxx We also put in the distro the text files from release/text/ -Ton-

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread pete larabell
Sorry to bother again, what exactly do you mean by make sure binary is stripped? On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Ton Roosendaal t...@blender.org wrote: Hi, Compression format you can choose freely, based on what FreeBSD users prefer. Make sure the binary is stripped, and make a release

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread Damien Plisson
Hi Ton, Using cmake on 33942 and building with xcode gave me the 2.56 directory in the app bundle fine. And the 2.56 directory is also created at runtime in the Application Support/Blender folder. Maybe it is an issue with cmake/makefiles ? Damien Le 29 déc. 2010 à 20:10, Ton Roosendaal a

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread pete larabell
Hey guys, I uploaded a build called blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz to download.blender.org/incoming but forgot to build it with RELEASE optimized compiler flags. I just rebuilt with appropriate flags, but now can't overwrite the bad file I uploaded first. Is there a way I can overwrite that

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread Thomas Dinges
You have to wait until someone with acces deletes the old file. No problem! Don't you worry! :) cheers, Thomas Am 29.12.2010 21:34, schrieb pete larabell: Hey guys, I uploaded a build called blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz to download.blender.org/incoming but forgot to build it with

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread pete larabell
So, do I need to send an email somewhere asking someone to do that, or was me indicating the error, and you responding to it, enough that someone will do it?? On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Thomas Dinges blen...@dingto.de wrote: You have to wait until someone with acces deletes the old file.

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread Thomas Dinges
Just be patient, someone with acces will read this and delete the old file. :) Thomas Am 29.12.2010 23:33, schrieb pete larabell: So, do I need to send an email somewhere asking someone to do that, or was me indicating the error, and you responding to it, enough that someone will do it??

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread pete larabell
awesome! Thanks so much Thomas! On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Dinges blen...@dingto.de wrote: Just be patient, someone with acces will read this and delete the old file. :) Thomas Am 29.12.2010 23:33, schrieb pete larabell: So, do I need to send an email somewhere asking

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread Diego B
Hi, I move the file to my home directory, so you can upload the new one. - Diego On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Diego B bdi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The bad one is: blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz ? - Diego On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:47 PM, pete larabell xgl.asyl...@gmail.com

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread pete larabell
thanks Diego On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Diego B bdi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I move the file to my home directory, so you can upload the new one. - Diego On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Diego B bdi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The bad one is:

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread pete larabell
Both i386 and amd64 tarballs are uploaded. I sent them to other FreeBSD users to test to make sure they extracted and ran successfully. :) they are: blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-i386.tbz blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz Cheers, Pete On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Ton Roosendaal

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread Diego B
Perfect, I will move those to my folder until all the others are ready. On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:17 PM, pete larabell xgl.asyl...@gmail.com wrote: Both i386 and amd64 tarballs are uploaded. I sent them to other FreeBSD users to test to make sure they extracted and ran successfully. :) they

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread mindrones
Hi, I have just tagged bf-extensions, revision 1327. I believe that Nathan will ask builders to build with a specific tag version of bf-blender, which he usually links with svn-externals to a specific bf-extensions tag. We've just added some scripts that were scheduled for release after

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread Dalai Felinto
It seems that I got home in time to kindly ask for people to include the blenderplayer whenever possible. thanks, Dalai -- I almost committed a small patch I had ready while with no internet ... waiting for svn unfreeze ;) 2010/12/29 Diego B bdi...@gmail.com Both on my home folder, thanks. On

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread pete larabell
Should I wait until further notice, svn up with new python scripts, rebuild and re-upload? On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Dalai Felinto dfeli...@gmail.com wrote: It seems that I got home in time to kindly ask for people to include the blenderplayer whenever possible. thanks, Dalai -- I

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread Diego B
Ton, Nathan, I will be back in about 8 hours, if you are back before and need the files there are in my home on the folder release. - Diego On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:40 PM, pete larabell xgl.asyl...@gmail.com wrote: Should I wait until further notice, svn up with new python scripts, rebuild

Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!

2010-12-29 Thread Nathan Letwory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29.12.2010 21:10, Ton Roosendaal wrote: SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag will be announced here too. Appologies for the slow tagging speed, but builders can now use: svn co -r 33947