This is a response to
https://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-committers/2018-February/049157.html
(I removed it from my mail server, so I can't hit 'reply' directly)
On 26-02-2018 22:54, Brecht van Lommel wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. Overall I agree with the approach.
>
> It would be
what about caching a volume ?
use round / position to get the volume adress that ownes the thing
this way we have a fixed size array of lists of chunks each space ownes?
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 10:29 AM Brecht Van Lommel
wrote:
> For baking we normally simulate all frames, and even when we
For baking we normally simulate all frames, and even when we don't the cost
of merging two Alembic files is probably acceptable. However for caching
while doing animation playback this is not the case. We can simulate some
frames, play back the frames simulated so far, and then continue simulating
