Re: [Bibdesk-users] MARC21 XML import

2012-02-27 Thread Simon Spiegel
On 25.02.2012, at 13:20, Christiaan Hofman wrote: If I understood correctly, the last nightly from February 24 should include the improved Marc21 XML parsing. Alas, I was still not able to import the file. Simon Apparently the extra part before the record makes it too long to

Re: [Bibdesk-users] MARC21 XML import

2012-02-25 Thread Simon Spiegel
On 23.02.2012, at 13:37, Adam Maxwell wrote: On Feb 23, 2012, at 1:31, Simon Spiegel si...@simifilm.ch wrote: Excellent. Thank you. BTW: I see that there hasn't been a nigthly since February 18, is this planned? Not planned. I'm away from the system and won't be able to fix it

Re: [Bibdesk-users] MARC21 XML import

2012-02-23 Thread Adam Maxwell
On Feb 23, 2012, at 1:31, Simon Spiegel si...@simifilm.ch wrote: Excellent. Thank you. BTW: I see that there hasn't been a nigthly since February 18, is this planned? Not planned. I'm away from the system and won't be able to fix it until tomorrow night at earliest. Adam

[Bibdesk-users] MARC21 XML import

2012-02-22 Thread Simon Spiegel
Hi, is BibDesk supposed to import MARC21-xml from files? I see that it is available as an option for search groups, but I wasn't able to import a MARC21-xml file I downloaded from the German National Library (dnb.de). See the attached file Importing a non-xml MARC21 file works fine, there's

Re: [Bibdesk-users] MARC21 XML import

2012-02-22 Thread Christiaan Hofman
Yes, BibDesk supports MarcXML. Just does not recognize this particular one, due to the extra type attribute in the record element. I'll modify the regex so this is recognized. Christiaan On Feb 22, 2012, at 14:18, Simon Spiegel wrote: Hi, is BibDesk supposed to import MARC21-xml from

Re: [Bibdesk-users] MARC21 XML import

2012-02-22 Thread Simon Spiegel
Excellent. Thank you. BTW: I see that there hasn't been a nigthly since February 18, is this planned? Simon On 22.02.2012, at 16:00, Christiaan Hofman wrote: Yes, BibDesk supports MarcXML. Just does not recognize this particular one, due to the extra type attribute in the record element.