On 14 Oct 2007, at 8:00 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, fixed now in the source.
>>
>>
>
>
> This works again, thanks for the quick fix. But I still see double
> entries in both the RTF preview display and in the exported RTF
> field. I have a template set up for the main page which on
>>
>
> Thanks, fixed now in the source.
>
>
This works again, thanks for the quick fix. But I still see double
entries in both the RTF preview display and in the exported RTF
field. I have a template set up for the main page which only contains
the tag <$publicationsUsingTemplate/>, but I a
Same as the other problem you reported, it's in parsing separator tags.
Christiaan
On 14 Oct 2007, at 6:41 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
>
>>>
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<4?><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><$name/>, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>und <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]/><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>
On 14 Oct 2007, at 5:59 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
>
>>
>> Sorry, but I still don't get my head around this. What I want to
>> achive is the following: In case of less than four editors, I want
>>
>> "Joe Smith, John Doe und Donald Knuth" – notice the missing comma
>> before the "und" which is the
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<4?><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><$name/>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>und <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]/><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> What I get is:
>>
>> "Joe Smith, John Doe, und Donald Knuth" – I want to get rid of the
>> comma before the "und", and this used to work befor
On 14 Oct 2007, at 3:07 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
>
>>>
- Have you changed something about the syntax? The following
snippet
Christiaan posted doesn't work anymore:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<4?>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]/>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]><$name/>
>
> Sorry, but I still don't get my head around this. What I want to
> achive is the following: In case of less than four editors, I want
>
> "Joe Smith, John Doe und Donald Knuth" – notice the missing comma
> before the "und" which is the only correct way in German. I use the
> following code:
>
>>
>>> - Have you changed something about the syntax? The following snippet
>>> Christiaan posted doesn't work anymore:
>>>
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<4?>
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]/>
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><$name/>, >>> et al.
>>>
>>
>> Here is the corrected template snippet:
>>
>
On 14.10.2007, at 13:52, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
> On 14 Oct 2007, at 10:06 AM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
>
>>
>> On 13.10.2007, at 19:58, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 13, 2007, at 10:48, Simon Spiegel wrote:
>>>
there seems to be a problem with the latest nightly which is
s
On 14 Oct 2007, at 10:06 AM, Simon Spiegel wrote:
>
> On 13.10.2007, at 19:58, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 13, 2007, at 10:48, Simon Spiegel wrote:
>>
>>> there seems to be a problem with the latest nightly which is somehow
>>> connected to the templates system.
>>
>> Yeah, it crashes h
On 13.10.2007, at 19:58, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2007, at 10:48, Simon Spiegel wrote:
>
>> there seems to be a problem with the latest nightly which is somehow
>> connected to the templates system.
>
> Yeah, it crashes here; looks like infinite recursion that blows the
> stack. Don
On Oct 13, 2007, at 10:48, Simon Spiegel wrote:
> there seems to be a problem with the latest nightly which is somehow
> connected to the templates system.
Yeah, it crashes here; looks like infinite recursion that blows the
stack. Don't use it.
--
adam
On 13.10.2007, at 19:48, Simon Spiegel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there seems to be a problem with the latest nightly which is somehow
> connected to the templates system. If I open my .bib file and have
> any of the templates chosen for "Preview Pane Display", BibDesk gives
> me the spinning wheel of deat
Hi,
there seems to be a problem with the latest nightly which is somehow
connected to the templates system. If I open my .bib file and have
any of the templates chosen for "Preview Pane Display", BibDesk gives
me the spinning wheel of death. I first thought that it could be
related to my s
14 matches
Mail list logo
