Gregory Hicks escreveu:
Greetings:
Seeing in my named.log entries for too many timeouts resolving
'some-domain-not-seen-before'... makes me wonder if my server is an
open recursive server.
Where is the test please for open recursion so I can check?
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:44:18 -0200
From: Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães leolis...@solutti.com.br
Gregory Hicks escreveu:
Greetings:
Seeing in my named.log entries for too many timeouts resolving
'some-domain-not-seen-before'... makes me wonder if my server is an
open recursive
I just test bind 9.5.0-P2 and 9.5.1-rc1
Bind 9.5.0-P2 allocate over 2Gb per 10 minutes of work.
Bind 9.5.1 allocate 2Gb per 30 hours.
14.12.2008, в 2:15, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 написал(а):
At Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:50:52 -0200,
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães leolis...@solutti.com.br wrote:
i'm
In article gi2uke$2d8...@sf1.isc.org,
=?UTF-8?B?TGVvbmFyZG8gUm9kcmlndWVzIE1hZ2FsaMOjZXM=?=
leolis...@solutti.com.br wrote:
CgpQZXRlciBEYW1iaWVyIGVzY3JldmV1Ogo+IEkgY2FuIGNvbmZpcm0gYmluZCA5LjQgZG9lcyBy
dW4gb24gYW4gKElCTSwgbm90IEludGVsKSA0ODYtU0NMLzIgd2l0aCAxNiBNQi4KPiBUaGF0IGNw
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:52:01 +0100
From: Peter Dambier pe...@peter-dambier.de
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Where is the open recursion test?
X-FuHaFi: 0.62
just try
dig -t any peter-dambier.de @your-server
If it tells you something about denic it is not recursive.
just try
dig -t any peter-dambier.de @your-server
If it tells you something about denic it is not recursive.
If you get the complete answer it is very likely recursive.
Something internal could have triggered the query but only
if your server is in /etc/resolv.conf.
Kind regards
Peter
Thank's to JINMEI Tatuya for support.
I have over 40 views, defined in named.conf, max-memory for cache -
32Mb. Named daemon allocate over 2 Gb per 24 hours of work.
Have you any ideas how to limit memory usage?
Dmitry Rybin wrote:
max-cache-size 64M;
# /usr/bin/limits -v 1200M
At Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:09:57 +0530,
Vinay Y S vi...@vys.in wrote:
I am studying the scalability and performance characteristics of
different DNS servers. Goal is to find the best suitable server to
host a single domain with 50 million records. I am planning to install
Fedora 10 x86_64 on a
In message sam.wilson-404a4b.13132515122...@scotsman.ed.ac.uk, Sam Wilson wri
tes:
In article ghubkr$9l...@sf1.isc.org,
Chris Buxton cbux...@menandmice.com wrote:
On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:57 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
The old mail-to-news gateway either got this right or
extracted the
Mark Andrews writes:
In message 9fc47420fb263da9eda170166fd4d...@cornell.edu, John Wobus writes:
Some years ago, I had that issue. The problem was that the
zone transfer compression mechanism could change the case
of individual names. This was fixed in some release of bind
(after
I'm seeing name queries from a couple clients on the network that
occur around every two minutes - the queries are evidently random and
are looking for A IN records of this form, as an example:
ungzbvyf.lzghmccim
They always look like this, 8 lowercase chars, dot, then 9 lowercase
chars - never
ponga2...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeing name queries from a couple clients on the network that
occur around every two minutes - the queries are evidently random and
are looking for A IN records of this form, as an example:
ungzbvyf.lzghmccim
They always look like this, 8 lowercase chars,
I'm seeing what looks like a stuck glue record in the GTLD servers and
I'm hoping I've just overlooked something simple. There are several
domains which list the following as their nameservers:
ns.netdentalcare.com
ns2.netdentalcare.com
The zone for these (netdentalcare.com)
In message a82dae2a-44ad-4aeb-a72c-a150e6d7f...@cyberlifelabs.com, Milo Hyson
writes:
I'm seeing what looks like a stuck glue record in the GTLD servers and
I'm hoping I've just overlooked something simple. There are several
domains which list the following as their nameservers:
Sorry I've lost track of the different versions, which works in Windows and
which don't.
So... what is the latest version, working in W2K3? And Is W2K still
abandoned?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sorry I've lost track of the different versions, which works in Windows and
which don't.
So... what is the latest version, working in W2K3? And Is W2K still
abandoned?
9.3.6, 9.4.3, or 9.5.0-P2-W2 (which is soon to be supplanted by 9.5.1,
currently in release-candidate status, as is
They've been changed for days:
ns.netdentalcare.com.
Server: ns1.idaserver.com.
Address:207.178.132.75#53
QUESTIONS:
ns.netdentalcare.com, type = A, class = IN
ANSWERS:
- ns.netdentalcare.com
internet address = 207.178.132.75
In message 029c7576bb4b4f1480bf8cf9d125a...@nc4010, Jukka Pakkanen writes:
Sorry I've lost track of the different versions, which works in Windows and
which don't.
So... what is the latest version, working in W2K3?
See the immediate downloads on https://www.isc.org/software/bind.
18 matches
Mail list logo
