Original Message
Subject: Re: about resolving on a child zone
From: Chris Buxton cbux...@menandmice.com
Date: Mon, April 13, 2009 10:31 am
To: Tech W. tech...@yahoo.com.cn
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
In this case, the answer is that your main zone (example.com) will
Hi all,
Can any one help me out, I'm having a problem setting up Dynamic DNS updates
using TSIG. I'm running ISC Bind 9 on SLES 10 and ISC DHCP 3.0.3 on SLES 10. I
need to get my DHCP to update my DNS. Here is my DNS and DHCP config plus the
error i'm getting from nsupdate. hostnames and IPs
On Apr 14, 2009, at 3:00 AM, Jeff Pang wrote:
In this case, the answer is that your main zone (example.com) will
have an error, because it will have an A record below the bottom of
the zone that is not a glue record. In other words, it will recognize
that www.my.example.com belongs to
Hello All,
I have a little problem while setting up my DNS.
In my LAN I want to use the local domain go.wiki. So I make the following
settings to the bind9 on my ubuntu server (hardy):
named.conf:
===
include /etc/bind/named.conf.options;
zone . {
type hint;
file
On Apr 14, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Frank Moeller wrote:
/etc/bind/db.go.wiki:
$ORIGIN go.wiki.
$TTL 1D
@ IN SOA localhost. hostmaster. (
200405191 ; serial
8H; refresh
4H; retry
Hello,
Which TTL value is supposed to be used for negative caching time?
-We are running BIND 9.X as a caching server. We are seeing that NXDOMAIN
replies are being cached using $TTL time of a given zone instead of its SOA min
TTL time.
-Is $TTL suppose to override SOA's min TTL for
Hi all,
I was reading up on TSIG signed zone-transfers and gave it a try in my
lab this morning, successfully. However what I noticed (which makes
sense based on my config) is that any host with the appropriate key is
allowed to perform a zone-transfer.
Is there any way to limit the
On Apr 14 2009, Lena M wrote:
Which TTL value is supposed to be used for negative caching time?
-We are running BIND 9.X
That's an awful lot of versions of BIND. Can't you be more specific?
as a caching server. We are seeing that NXDOMAIN
replies are being cached
On Apr 14 2009, Jonathan Petersson wrote:
I was reading up on TSIG signed zone-transfers and gave it a try in my
lab this morning, successfully. However what I noticed (which makes
sense based on my config) is that any host with the appropriate key is
allowed to perform a zone-transfer.
Is
Thanks!
/Jonathan
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Apr 14 2009, Jonathan Petersson wrote:
I was reading up on TSIG signed zone-transfers and gave it a try in my
lab this morning, successfully. However what I noticed (which makes
sense based on my
10 matches
Mail list logo
