Re: S-NAPTR and lightweight resolver

On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 09:38:25AM +1000, Mark Andrews mark_andr...@isc.org wrote a message of 26 lines which said: It is up to the application to sort and process the returned records. But I suspect that this is precisely what the OP wanted (and expected BIND to do). Does

Semi-OT, BIND dlz and excessive queries

The DLZ users mailing list is pretty quiet, thought to ask here in case someone can elaborate. I have MySql query logging on so I can see the queries as they come in for testing. dig example.com @localhost This yields a hit to the database of 090509 5:50:56 2593 Query SELECT zone

Re: Semi-OT, BIND dlz and excessive queries

afaik, yes it's expected - for the reason that we don't yet have a smart way across all types of database to find the most specific match without doing multiple queries. -david Scott Haneda wrote: The DLZ users mailing list is pretty quiet, thought to ask here in case someone can elaborate.

socket.c:4524: unexpected error

Hello, I've been seeing more and more of the following errors in all of our name servers running Bind 9.4.3-2 on CentOS 5.3 servers: May 8 11:00:44 ns3 named[7502]: socket.c:4524: unexpected error: May 8 11:00:44 ns3 named[7502]: 22/Invalid argument May 8 11:00:45 ns3 named[7502]: