Shane Wegner wrote:
Hello,
I am looking at setting up tkey between master and slave
nameservers but have been unable to find documentation on
how to get this going properly. In the bind9 manual, there
is a whole section on TSIG and setting up shared secrets
between servers but how does one do
Just to add to the excellent comments already posted here, using +trace can
be helpful in seeing how things are delegated. I use the paid version of
DNSreports to provide a non-tech friendly version of the delegation, which
has the added benefit of beings able to trace it down other branches as
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:42:28AM +0200,
Christoph Weber-Fahr cwf...@arcor.de wrote
a message of 29 lines which said:
Does it even compile with current bind versions?
Yes and it is even now officially included in BIND (starting from 9.4,
I believe), no need to patch.
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Jesse Cabral wrote:
When I rerun ./configure --disable-threads the configure file does not
update.
I guess you mean the config.h doesn't update. But probably the
./lib/isc/include/isc/platform.h file did change (so
ISC_PLATFORM_USETHREADS is no longer defined). (In my
Hi,
Is it possible to set weight for records?
for example,I have these two A records:
wwwIN A 192.168.1.100
IN A 192.168.1.101
But I want 192.168.1.100 take the weight of 75%, and 192.168.1.101 take the
weight of 25%. That means, when clients query for www.domain.com, 1.100
Maybe cheat with round robin? Add 3 copies of one record and 1 of the
other. That should give you 75/25 roughly.
I don't think it's a dead on exact thing bit it may be close enough
for your needs.
--
Scott
Iphone says hello.
On Jun 4, 2009, at 7:09 PM, Tech W. tech...@yahoo.com.cn wrote:
Since I read that the root is supposed to be signed by the end of the
year, I am just trying to understand DNSSEC support and the various
versions of BIND a little better here, so please don't throw too many
rocks if I ask something stupid...
I run the nameservers for an ISP. For the recursive
Scott Haneda wrote:
Maybe cheat with round robin? Add 3 copies of one record and 1 of the
other. That should give you 75/25 roughly.
BIND won't let you do that, it'll throw away the duplicates when it
loads the zone.
You need some other piece of software or hardware that can do that
(insert
Scott Haneda wrote:
Maybe cheat with round robin? Add 3 copies of one record and 1 of the
other. That should give you 75/25 roughly.
BIND won't let you do that, it'll throw away the duplicates when it
loads the zone.
You need some other piece of software or hardware that can do that
(insert
9 matches
Mail list logo
