Hello,
I have Bind-9.6.1 running on our university environment, have been using
dynamic update.
My question is, when other DNS query my named for a record, for example
test.example.com, but this record doesn't exist. How long time will the remote
DNS cache this nonexist record?
I found the
Hello everyone,
i've stumbled into a question whether it is possible to configure BIND
in a way that it responds to DNS SRV requests with the priority flag
changed depending on the IP address of the requesting party.
For example,
there are two SRV records for _foobar._tcp. One points to 10.0.1.2
On Jul 20 2009, Tech W. wrote:
I have Bind-9.6.1 running on our university environment, have been
using dynamic update.
My question is, when other DNS query my named for a record, for example
test.example.com, but this record doesn't exist. How long time will the
remote DNS cache this
Rather than applying lipstick to the pig, why not run a local
caching-only resolver? Move up and out of the stub-ville slums. A local
instance of named doesn't take up that much server resources (disk,
memory, CPU), and pays you back by *not*, as a stub resolver does, using
network resources,
Ken Lai wrote:
Scott Haneda wrote:
99% of the time openDNS works by just pointing some agent to their ip
space.
That 1% of the time, openDNS tries to make DNS responses that are
modified in a way to try to help you.
Maybe this is your issue?
Googl.com being common enough they elect to
At Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:13:03 +0100,
Ian Tait ia...@thoughtbubble.net wrote:
I see exactly this problem too on windows 2003.
Lookups happen normally after this behaviour occurs though.
Restarting bind cures the problem.
I haven't bothered to debug the issue as yet :-)
We've found a bug that
At Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:41:24 -0700,
JINMEI Tatuya jin...@isc.org wrote:
We've found a bug that can cause this problem. We're working on a
complete fix to the problem, but a workaround patch copied below may
work for you in the mean time.
Sorry that patch was incorrect. Copying the correct
The problem with this approach is when you are running a couple thousand
servers - suddenly, you are running a couple thousand more instances of BIND
that need monitoring/patching/care/feeding.
A more clever resolver, or a simpler caching setup locally would be ideal.
Otherwise, you could
Todd Snyder wrote:
The problem with this approach is when you are running a couple thousand
servers - suddenly, you are running a couple thousand more instances of BIND
that need monitoring/patching/care/feeding.
A more clever resolver, or a simpler caching setup locally would be ideal.
In message 950.42549...@web15608.mail.cnb.yahoo.com, Tech W. writes:
Hello,
I have Bind-9.6.1 running on our university environment, have been using dyna
mic update.
My question is, when other DNS query my named for a record, for example test.
example.com, but this record doesn't
--- On Tue, 21/7/09, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
From: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org
Subject: Re: about cache nonexist record
To: Tech W. tech...@yahoo.com.cn
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Received: Tuesday, 21 July, 2009, 8:01 AM
In message 950.42549...@web15608.mail.cnb.yahoo.com,
In message 4a64c374.4000...@serpro.gov.br, Breno Silveira Soares writes:
Hi list,
I have some servers with bind 9.5.0.P2 and one with bind 9.6.1.
And the servers logs have a lot of messages with after disabling EDNS
as seen above:
[...]
Jul 20 15:31:34 server named[6909]:
12 matches
Mail list logo
