Re: Binding on addresses

2009-07-29 Thread Mark Andrews
In message h4ofir$rt...@ger.gmane.org, Chris Hills writes: Hi After changing configuration from listen-on-v6 { any; }; to using specific addresses, I observed the following in the log after issuing `rndc reload` (times are CEST):- 29-Jul-2009 04:44:22.893 network: error: binding TCP

Re: about tcp port 53

2009-07-29 Thread Fr34k
Hello, Doing a search on this at www.google.com offers this first link: http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_DNSMessageGenerationandTransport-2.htm HTH - Original Message From: Tech W. tech...@yahoo.com.cn To: Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Sent:

Re: SRV Record Priority set by IP Address

2009-07-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 20.07.09 13:26, Lev Vanyan wrote: i've stumbled into a question whether it is possible to configure BIND in a way that it responds to DNS SRV requests with the priority flag changed depending on the IP address of the requesting party. For example, there are two SRV records for

9.5.1-P1 to 9.6.1-P1

2009-07-29 Thread Sandy Mackenzie
Any known gotcha's for this upgrade? -- Sandy Mackenzie The contents of this e-mail message and all attachments are intended for the confidential use of the addressee and where addressed to our client are the subject of solicitor and client privilege. Any retention, review, reproduction,

Re: 9.5.1-P1 to 9.6.1-P1

2009-07-29 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Sandy Mackenzie wrote: Any known gotcha's for this upgrade? The significant 9.6.0 changes are listed at https://www.isc.org/software/bind/new-features/9.6 The BIND 9.6.1 minor release has numerous improvements especially in portability, documentation, and DNSSEC. The

Correction to signatures on yesterday's BIND 9 releases

2009-07-29 Thread Evan Hunt
Due to a combination of circumstances, including extreme rush and the usual signer of our releases being away at IETF, we accidentally signed yesterday's BIND 9 patch releases (9.4.3-P3, 9.5.1-P3, and 9.6.1-P1) with the expired 2006 ISC signing key rather than the current one, and didn't notice

Re: Is my slave DNS working right?

2009-07-29 Thread Kevin Darcy
The +trace option *forces* dig to step through each level of the hierarchy. Therefore it's not a good way of testing any kind of override of the normal iterative-resolution process.

Re: Creating a CNAME to another domain.

2009-07-29 Thread Kevin Darcy
Danny Mayer wrote: Kevin Darcy wrote: Ezra Taylor wrote: Hello All: How can I create a CNAME that points to another domain. Example below. Is the below example possible? stars.mydomain.com http://stars.mydomain.com INCNAME stars.otherdomain.com

[SPAM] Win2k and bind

2009-07-29 Thread Greg
I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side ...MS DNS) but I want to come back. My question is this I have win2K servers what version of bind will run on this? Thanks Greg This message has been checked by

Re: [SPAM] Win2k and bind

2009-07-29 Thread Jukka Pakkanen
Unfortunately W2K was dropped a while ago, no safe version available for it. I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side ...MS DNS) but I want to come back. My question is this I have win2K servers what

Re: Dig shows wrong ip

2009-07-29 Thread Danny Mayer
Chris Thompson wrote: On Jul 28 2009, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: % dig +short a dns3.potomacnetworks.com @a.gtld-servers.net 216.250.243.230 As long as that host record exists, with an IP different from what your authoritative servers reply with, you are going to have problems, because