Re: Different handling of referrals by dig and nslookup

2010-02-21 Thread Mark Andrews
In message a5a893391002200851u131155c4h6fca226d27939...@mail.gmail.com, kalpe sh varyani writes: Hi Doug, Please find my response inline. On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote: On 02/13/10 18:42, kalpesh varyani wrote: Hi Rick, I am aware that

Re: Duplicating queries??

2010-02-21 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/19/10 23:07, Daniel Morgan wrote: I have a couple of BIND servers that I have inherited. I'm getting some upstream complaints that one of them is issuing duplicate queries on occasions - probably about a dozen times a day. You didn't mention what version of BIND you're running. I'm

Re: Different handling of referrals by dig and nslookup

2010-02-21 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/20/10 08:54, kalpesh varyani wrote: Thanks Dave for pointing this out. the first server did not fail, it behaved as per its configuration. But for a stub resolver, which cannot follow referrals, isnt it logical for it to detect referrals and move on to the next name server in the

Re: Duplicating queries??

2010-02-21 Thread Daniel Morgan
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 17:23 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: On 02/19/10 23:07, Daniel Morgan wrote: I have a couple of BIND servers that I have inherited. I'm getting some upstream complaints that one of them is issuing duplicate queries on occasions - probably about a dozen times a day.

Installing 9.7?

2010-02-21 Thread Daniel Morgan
This may seem like a retarded question. Following advice to update I've downloaded the 9.7 source and built it as per the readme: ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Installing 9.7?

2010-02-21 Thread Larry Brower
Daniel Morgan wrote: This may seem like a retarded question. Following advice to update I've downloaded the 9.7 source and built it as per the readme: Was there a question somewhere? ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org