Dear Sten,
I didn't give the domain I'm encountering problems with because it
seemed irrelevant to me.
As Stéphane Bortzmeyer says in his message of 01/03/10 11:44, it's best
to give names, so here goes :
x.fr is labanquepostale.fr
1 is imag.imag.fr
2 is brahma.imag.fr
3 is isis.imag.fr
4
Cher Stéphane,
Dans sa grande sagesse, Stephane Bortzmeyer a écrit, le 01/03/10 11:44 :
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 06:51:44PM +0100,
Oliver Henriotoliver.henr...@imag.fr wrote
a message of 104 lines which said:
but my computing skills are scarce and I still have a lot to learn.
For
named restart doesn't solve the problem for me.
Best regards,
Oliver
Dans sa grande sagesse, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) a écrit, le
01/03/10 10:47 :
We have similar problem with a master with 9.5.1.p3 and 4 slaves with 9.5.2
p1...We are getting SERVFAIL on slaves occasionally, and we
could you please point out what is wrong in my delegation?
From: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
To: sasa sasa sasasa20...@yahoo.com
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Sat, February 27, 2010 3:10:28 AM
Subject: Re: hosts or subnet number in delegation?
On
Hi all,
I have 2 slave 1 master server.
master is located in different subnet from the slaves.
Lets say, 10.1.1.1 (ns1) and 10.1.1.2 (ns2) are the real ip addresses of the
slaves which have public NAT address for allowing queries from internet for
authoritive zones. These public address lets
Hello,
please configure your mailer to wrap lines below 80 characters per line.
72 to 75 is usually OK.
Thank you.
On 02.03.10 14:02, Fuat Demir (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote:
I have 2 slave 1 master server.
master is located in different subnet from the slaves.
Lets say, 10.1.1.1 (ns1) and
bind-sugg...@isc.org ?
I'm not sure how much attention it will get right this moment - it
depends on the persuasiveness of the argument for it, and the number of
folks popping up to say 'yes please, I need it too!'.
But it doesn't on the face of it sound too technically difficult and the
code is
Mark,
Thanks much for clearing this up ! I get it now -- the lookup
algorighm is opportunistic, and starts below the root if the right NS
records are already in cache. Having stub zones insures that is always
the case -- very cool !
Also thanks to everyone else who responded !
--Gabriel
On Tue,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I would now like to have one main config that would include small files
containing those statements.
Since listen-on and notify are in options statement; while
statistics-channel is a statement of its own, I would like to know, if
it's possible to define
On Jan 14, 2010, at 8:43 AM, pollex wrote:
I do not see any activity in the thread... is everyone on holidays?
Regards
nope not dead just sleeping :)
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Hi
Seen from here, I get a fast response to dig labanquepostale.fr.
Using your servers 1 - 4 shows only that they do not answer recursive
queries, that is diferent from my first try but a good change.
To have good resolution a nameserver must have access via:
UDP from any local port to remote
1. DNS uses UDP primarily.
2. The nameservers for labanquepostale.fr appear to be on the same
subnet. If true, then there are likely to be one or more points of
failure (e.g. switch, router, WAN link) for the whole zone. What you
might be seeing are relatively-normal short, temporary outages,
Dear Stan,
Dans sa grande sagesse, Sten Carlsen a écrit, le 02/03/2010 18:43 :
Hi
Seen from here, I get a fast response to dig labanquepostale.fr.
When you query your own servers?
I get a fast response from isis.imag.fr and imag.imag.fr; it's only
brahma.imag.fr and cosmos.imag.fr who
Dear Kevin,
Dans sa grande sagesse, Kevin Darcy a écrit, le 02/03/2010 20:08 :
1. DNS uses UDP primarily.
My mistake, telnet is not sufficient as a test.
2. The nameservers for labanquepostale.fr appear to be on the same
subnet. If true, then there are likely to be one or more points of
Good day,
We've started seeing this bug on a couple servers, but I see no mention
of it being fixed, so I don't know what version I should upgrade to.
Nor can I find anything that lays out the impact/risk of this.
Does anyone know the status of this bug?
Thanks!
From:
In message 4b8ce12b.4010...@imag.fr, Oliver Henriot writes:
but nothing shows up when carrying out the failed request. I even tried=20
debug level and it gave nothing when I did :
dig www.labanquepostale.fr @129.88.30.10
; DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 =20
On 3/2/2010 8:38 AM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
On Jan 14, 2010, at 8:43 AM, pollex wrote:
I do not see any activity in the thread... is everyone on holidays?
Regards
nope not dead just sleeping :)
... pining for the fjords.
--
... and that's just a little bit of history
Hello
It is like below,
options {
Bla
Bla
Bla
notify no;
Bla
Bla
bla
};
I checked notify messages but in also-notify setting for a specific zone does
not have any public IP address like 1.1.1.1 or 1.1.1.2...
-Original Message-
From: Fuat Demir (Garanti Teknoloji)
Sent:
Hello,
please configure your mailer to wrap lines below 80 characters per line.
72 to 75 is usually OK.
Thank you.
On 03.03.10 09:27, Fuat Demir (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote:
Notify no statement is in my global conigurations in named.conf under
options tab.
did you:
check all notify settings
On 03.03.10 09:41, Fuat Demir (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote:
I checked notify messages but in also-notify setting for a specific zone
does not have any public IP address like 1.1.1.1 or 1.1.1.2...
did you check whole file, includes, etc?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ;
20 matches
Mail list logo
