In message 20100316131539.ga10...@fantomas.sk, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
writes:
It's apparently because DNS was designed to provide records that exist,
not those that do not.
On 17.03.10 09:22, Mark Andrews wrote:
Actually it's designed to provide records that exist *and* to tell you
when
On 16.03.10 15:18, Jack Tavares wrote:
What is the default build on linux (2.6) with regard to threads.
If I don't explicitly enable or disable threads, does named
run threaded or unthreaded?
from the manpage for named(8):
-n #cpus
Create #cpus worker threads to take
Hello
How does BIND handle multiple masters in a slave zone definition? I know
that if one master doesn't answer, a second one is checked for new zone
data, but does BIND periodically check ALL master servers for new data?
Best regards
Fabian Gut
--
Fabian Gut
Trainee
open systems ag
In article mailman.859.1268840913.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Fabian Gut f...@open.ch wrote:
Hello
How does BIND handle multiple masters in a slave zone definition? I know
that if one master doesn't answer, a second one is checked for new zone
data, but does BIND periodically check
I cannot get the NSEC3 records through a BIND resolver if it is
version = 9.5:
% dig +dnssec jhfgTCFGD564564.org
; DiG 9.5.1-P3 +dnssec @dnssec.generic-nic.net jhfgTCFGD564564.org
; (2 servers found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY,
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
I cannot get the NSEC3 records through a BIND resolver if it is
version = 9.5:
% dig +dnssec jhfgTCFGD564564.org
If BIND = 9.6, it works (or with Unbound). Yes, NSEC3 support was
added in 9.6 but, for older BINDs, TYPE50 (NSEC3) should be an
On 16.03.10 15:18, Jack Tavares wrote:
What is the default build on linux (2.6) with regard to threads.
If I don't explicitly enable or disable threads, does named
run threaded or unthreaded?
On most operating systems, the default is threaded.
On linux, the default is unthreaded, for
You said:
On most operating systems, the default is threaded.
On linux, the default is unthreaded, for historical reasons having t
do with an odd interaction between linux threads and linux process
privileges. I expect we'll correct this fairly soon; it's on the
to-do list for 9.7.1.
[Jack
Well, the zone is publishing NS records that all return REFUSED when I
query them, so from my point of view the whole domain is broken.
The *best* approach here is to contact the domain admin and get them to
fix it.
In the absence of that, how to circumvent it? ns1.ecb.int apparently
[Jack Tavares] So, for bind 9.6.x and 9.7.0 is the recommendation to run
nonthreaded?
No, not at all. Threaded works fine--I use it myself. It's just a little
touchy about file permissions. On linux, I'm given to understand, a
multi-threaded application can't relinquish its root privileges
10 matches
Mail list logo
