Delegation and recursion

2010-05-09 Thread Angela Perez
Hi, I'm just writing to confirm that I have the correct understanding of the relationship between delegation and recursion. A bit of background: I'm responsible for an Internet-facing server that has the following requirements. It should support recursion for known (DMZ) clients and it should

UAE punycode in zone

2010-05-09 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello *, Since some days there are Puny-Code Domains for arabic domains available and now I have gotten a request from a customer to setup one... =8O How must I do this? For example for the Domain تامايدوجان.سى tamay-dogan.sa Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack

Re: Delegation and recursion

2010-05-09 Thread Gary Wallis
Angela Perez wrote: Hi, I'm just writing to confirm that I have the correct understanding of the relationship between delegation and recursion. A bit of background: I'm responsible for an Internet-facing server that has the following requirements. It should support recursion for known (DMZ)

Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Peter Janssen
Hi, might be me, but I don't get it. # dig @ns.nic.se nic.se ns +dnssec ; DiG 9.7.0-P1 @ns.nic.se nic.se ns +dnssec ; (2 servers found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15071 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0,

Re: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread R Dicaire
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Peter Janssen peter.jans...@eurid.euwrote: ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ns.nic.se. 3600IN A 212.247.7.228 ns.nic.se. 3600IN 2a00:801:f0:53::53 ns2.nic.se. 3600IN A 194.17.45.54

RE: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Peter Janssen
Hi Rick, as per the header of Dig output… ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 9 a part from that, I'm glad that my counting is still up to par :-) R. --Pj. Peter Janssen Technical Manager Join us in June! EURid hosts ICANN’s 38th meeting in Brussels.  Find out

Re: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Sten Carlsen
On 09/05/10 17:24, Peter Janssen wrote: Hi, might be me, but I don't get it. ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 9 ADDITIONAL: 9 But as you count to 8, where is number 9. I seem to be counting as Peter here. The issue I have with this is, dig announces

Re: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread R Dicaire
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Peter Janssen peter.jans...@eurid.euwrote: as per the header of Dig output… ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 9 Curious, I too get 9 but only 8 RRs are shown: ; DiG 9.7.0-P1 +dnssec @rdb.ardynet.com ardynet.com ns ; (2

RE: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Peter Janssen
Or this one : # dig @j.ns.se se. dnskey +dnssec ; DiG 9.7.0-P1 @j.ns.se se. dnskey +dnssec ; (2 servers found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 24743 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; WARNING: recursion

Re: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Shumon Huque
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 05:48:34PM +0200, Peter Janssen wrote: Hi Rick, as per the header of Dig output? ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 9 a part from that, I'm glad that my counting is still up to par :-) R. --Pj. Peter Janssen Technical Manager

RE: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Chris Thompson
On May 9 2010, Peter Janssen wrote: Maybe this is related to the EDNS0 stuff? Precisely so. dig does not display the OPT RR in the reply (or that in the question if you use +qr, for that matter), but it's there in the additional section as you can see from the count. You don't have to use

Fwd: Re: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Hauke Lampe
On 05/09/2010 05:24 PM, Peter Janssen wrote: ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 9 The issue I have with this is, dig announces 9 additional section entries, while 3 A, 1 and 4 RRSIG, in my book sums up to 8. The additional section also contains the EDNS0

Re: UAE punycode in zone

2010-05-09 Thread Warren Kumari
I am *so* not an IDN person (although I did follow the IDNA WG for a while), but I *believe* that the process is just to convert the native UTF8 representation (تامايدوجان.سى) to punycode (xn-- mgbaajmr6mmaps.xn--ygb8b). There are a bunch of tools that will do this for you, I suspect that

Re: Dig 9.7 DNSSEC output

2010-05-09 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 023b01caef8b$c0e22860$42a679...@janssen@eurid.eu, Peter Janssen writes: Hi, might be me, but I don't get it. The issue I have with this is, dig announces 9 additional section entries, while 3 A, 1 and 4 RRSIG, in my book sums up to 8. The 9th record is the OPT record and

Re: bind-users Digest, Vol 512, Issue 3

2010-05-09 Thread rams
RnPlqRyHoVdkkHyCFumEkMZVyneu1g== -- aRDy Music/Rick Dicaire http://www.ardynet.com http://linux.ardynet.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20100509/aae95b92/attachment-0001.html