In message aanlktil45qvwbpxoglssjxfejkhmvypsrqwfwj_gj...@mail.gmail.com, rams
writes:
Hi,
I have delegation of NS records in my zone and i signed zone using RSASHA1
algorithm. It is signed successfully. When I checked the the zone i am not
seeing RRSIG for delegated NS records.
There
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:54:57AM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote:
One strategy would be to set up a view that matches recursive queries
only. Set allow-query to none at the view, then set it any (or
whatever) in each zone of type forward or stub.
Thank you Chris.
Unfortunately, allow-query is
On 05/11/2010 09:12 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.05.10 16:20, Phil Mayers wrote:
We're doing some DNSSEC testing with sub-zones of our main zone, and I
had a little accident largely due to my own incompetence today where I
basically did this:
1. Existing zone example.com; create new
Following on from yesterdays query; if I have this zone:
test.com. 86400 IN SOA ...
test.com. 86400 IN NS ...
foo.test.com. 86400 IN NS ns.foo.test.com.
ns.foo.test.com.86400 IN A 192.168.254.254
In article mailman.1488.1273575364.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Following on from yesterdays query; if I have this zone:
test.com. 86400 IN SOA ...
test.com. 86400 IN NS ...
foo.test.com.
On 11/05/10 12:20, Barry Margolin wrote:
In articlemailman.1488.1273575364.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Phil Mayersp.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Following on from yesterdays query; if I have this zone:
test.com. 86400 IN SOA ...
test.com. 86400
In message 4be937b1.7070...@imperial.ac.uk, Phil Mayers writes:
Following on from yesterdays query; if I have this zone:
test.com. 86400 IN SOA ...
test.com. 86400 IN NS ...
foo.test.com. 86400 IN NS ns.foo.test.com.
7 matches
Mail list logo