RE: Defining custom root zone by subnet.

2010-07-13 Thread Nadir Aliyev
Its maybe sily just for you. But not for all. For example, I authorize users via radius with 2 way: without acl and with guest acl. So I give same dns servers to all users, but I give public ip to the normal users and private ip to the users with guest acl for purpose redirecting all dns

RE: Defining custom root zone by subnet.

2010-07-13 Thread Nadir Aliyev
Not helped... view internal-in in { match-clients { zone1; }; recursion yes; zone . { type master; file db.lockdown; }; }; -Original Message- From: Nadir Aliyev [mailto:na...@ultel.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 3:28 PM To:

RE: bind-users Digest, Vol 573, Issue 2

2010-07-13 Thread Nadir Aliyev
-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20100713/178f7aef/at tachment-0001.html -- Message: 3 Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:43:14 -0500 From: Larry Brower la...@maxqe.com Subject: Re: Defining custom root zone by subnet

reason for expected covering NSEC3, got an exact match ?

2010-07-13 Thread Gilles Massen
Hello, I have a signed zone (dnssec.lu) with NSEC3 / no optout, signed through OpenDNSSEC. The zone contains a wildcard with a TXT and A record. Each time the server is queried for something where the QNAME is matched by the wildcard, but the QTYPE is not, named logs a warning: expected covering

Re: reason for expected covering NSEC3, got an exact match ?

2010-07-13 Thread Kalman Feher
It looks like normal NSEC to me, unless you are referring to an isolated copy of the domain not accessible to the public: ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 22416 ;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version:

Re: reason for expected covering NSEC3, got an exact match ?

2010-07-13 Thread Gilles Massen
Kalman Feher wrote: It looks like normal NSEC to me, unless you are referring to an isolated copy of the domain not accessible to the public: Yes, indeed, sorry about that. I should keep my playgrounds tidier. The actual zone is located on nssec.restena.lu, and is publicly queriable (even with

Re: reason for expected covering NSEC3, got an exact match ?

2010-07-13 Thread Kalman Feher
Ok now I see it. The response appears ok, but the log entry is odd. I see the same on my test box (9.7.1 not patched to P1 yet). A brief thread on this occurred earlier in the year (archived here): http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Comp/comp.protocols.dns.bind/2010-03 /msg00282.html On

Re: reason for expected covering NSEC3, got an exact match ?

2010-07-13 Thread Gilles Massen
Kalman Feher wrote: Ok now I see it. The response appears ok, but the log entry is odd. I see the same on my test box (9.7.1 not patched to P1 yet). I saw this on earlier 9.7 as well. A brief thread on this occurred earlier in the year (archived here):

Performance tuning tips required for bind 9.6.1-P3!!!

2010-07-13 Thread Shiva Raman
Dear All This is in reference to the performance tuning , i had already gone through the mailing list archives , but could not find answer to my specific query mentioned here. I had installed bind as a caching name server for test purposes and planning to test performance that could give me

Re: Performance tuning tips required for bind 9.6.1-P3!!!

2010-07-13 Thread Dave Sparro
On 7/13/2010 1:11 PM, Shiva Raman wrote: Dear All This is in reference to the performance tuning , i had already gone through the mailing list archives , but could not find answer to my specific query mentioned here. Right now i am using queryperf to test the performance with sample query

Re: Bind hang out when named reach to 5-600 Mb

2010-07-13 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Thu, 8 Jul 2010 02:30:25 -0700 (PDT), khanh rua duonghoahoc_k4...@yahoo.com wrote: I install bind as a cache server on Solaris 10, Sun Sparc T5140. It has problem, bind always hang out when named reach to 5-600 Mb ('prstat' check). I have several servers and all have this problem even when

ad flag for RRSIG queries

2010-07-13 Thread Marco Davids (SIDN)
Hi, Can anyone explain to me why the 'ad'-flag is set for this query? dig +dnssec -t RRSIG www.forfunsec.org How does a validating resolver determine that such an answer is secure? Thank you. -- Marco Davids ___ bind-users mailing list

Re: ad flag for RRSIG queries

2010-07-13 Thread Doug Barton
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Marco Davids (SIDN) wrote: Hi, Can anyone explain to me why the 'ad'-flag is set for this query? dig +dnssec -t RRSIG www.forfunsec.org I'm using 9.7.1-P1 with dlv and I'm not seeing the AD flag on that. What version of BIND are you using? Doug -- Improve

Re: ad flag for RRSIG queries

2010-07-13 Thread Doug Barton
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Marco Davids (SIDN) wrote: On 07/13/10 23:58, Doug Barton wrote: Can anyone explain to me why the 'ad'-flag is set for this query? dig +dnssec -t RRSIG www.forfunsec.org I'm using 9.7.1-P1 with dlv and I'm not seeing the AD flag on that. What version of BIND are you

Re: GeoIP and maintaining high availability

2010-07-13 Thread Doug Barton
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Hi, I'm about to set up bind with GeoIP patches. What I'm not sure, is how do you guys handle high availability? Suppose I have zones for Americas and Europe, Just to be clear, you're saying that you have 2 different zones, one with the