Re: ignoring incorrect nameservers in authority section

2010-12-30 Thread pyh
Sunil Shetye writes: Quoting from p...@mail.nsbeta.info's mail on Thu, Dec 30, 2010: What's the difference between these two flags in the response of dig? ;; flags: qr ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0 ra : recursion available The nameserver is ready to ask other

Re: ignoring incorrect nameservers in authority section

2010-12-30 Thread pyh
Sunil Shetye writes: Case 2: Lame Server Reply === $ dig +norecurse @a.iana-servers.net. example.org. ;; flags: qr ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;example.org. IN A ;; ANSWER

Re: ignoring incorrect nameservers in authority section

2010-12-30 Thread Sunil Shetye
Quoting from p...@mail.nsbeta.info's mail on Thu, Dec 30, 2010: Where is the document for these flags? I google'd but got no correct result :) http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_DNSMessageHeaderandQuestionSectionFormat.htm -- Sunil Shetye. ___

Re: ignoring incorrect nameservers in authority section

2010-12-30 Thread Torinthiel
Dnia 2010-12-30 19:18 p...@mail.nsbeta.info napisał(a): Please see this dig: $ dig +norec dev.game.yy.com @202.96.128.166 ; DiG 9.4.2-P2 +norec dev.game.yy.com @202.96.128.166 ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 31949 ;; flags: qr rd

Re: ignoring incorrect nameservers in authority section

2010-12-30 Thread Torinthiel
Dnia 2010-12-30 11:45 Torinthiel napisał(a): Dnia 2010-12-30 18:03 p...@mail.nsbeta.info napisał(a): Sunil Shetye writes: Case 2: Lame Server Reply === $ dig +norecurse @a.iana-servers.net. example.org. ;; flags: qr ra;

Re: bind 9.7.2-P3 does not resolve www.microsoft.com

2010-12-30 Thread Lazy
2010/12/30 Lazy lazy...@gmail.com: 2010/12/28 Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org: trying to resolve www.microsoft.com or microsoft.com results in a connection timed out; no servers could be reached Well, for what it's worth - it's not just you having that issue. When testing from home and

Re: Question on ADDITIONAL SECTION

2010-12-30 Thread David Sparro
On 12/30/2010 6:12 AM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: $ dig www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166 ; DiG 9.4.2-P2 www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166 ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65353 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

Re: bind 9.7.2-P3 does not resolve www.microsoft.com

2010-12-30 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Lazy lazy...@gmail.com: 2010/12/30 Lazy lazy...@gmail.com: 2010/12/28 Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org: trying to resolve www.microsoft.com or microsoft.com results in a connection timed out; no servers could be reached Well, for what it's worth - it's not just you having

Re: bind 9.7.2-P3 does not resolve www.microsoft.com

2010-12-30 Thread Lazy
2010/12/30 Tony Finch d...@dotat.at: On 30 Dec 2010, at 19:56, Lazy lazy...@gmail.com wrote: qmail uses ANY so m$ is not getting any mail from us This is several bugs in qmail. It is making the query in order to canonicalize the domain in outgoing email, which it does not need to do

Dynamic zone...

2010-12-30 Thread Jeff Justice
I apologize in advance for my limited understanding of BIND. I know just enough to have our primary and secondary running without any problems, but I am needing to do something new. I searched this list for anything about dynamically updating a zone, but to be honest, it all seems over

Best practize to store the ZONE files

2010-12-30 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello *, I am hosting on my 6 NameServers 200.000 Domains and now in the meantime it becomes complicate because they are arround 230.000 files now including sub domains. There are currrently 18 TLs. My Question is: How do you handel such amount of files and where is the best