listman,
why this user has been always staying here for sending spams?
Regards.
Juan O writes:
Heya,how are you doing recently ? I would like to introduce you a very good
company which i knew.Their website is [www.bestseller-offer.com] .
___
From RFC 1123
One aspect of host name syntax is hereby changed: the
restriction on the first character is relaxed to allow either a
letter or a digit. Host software MUST support this more liberal
syntax.
p...@mail.nsbeta.info writes:
Joseph S D Yao writes:
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 14:49 +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
The book Pro DNS and BIND says:
If the caching server obtains its data directly from an authoritative DNS,
then it too will respond as authoritative. Ohterwise, if the data is
supplied from its cache, the response is
That is no longer the case. It doesn't respond authoritative on the first
query.
-Ben Croswell
On Jan 30, 2011 10:01 AM, Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 14:49 +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
The book Pro DNS and BIND says:
If the caching server obtains its data
Hi folks,
I have ddns setup in a testing env, its working.
ddns-domainname is dhcp6.example.com. Clients get assigned
host.dhcp6.example.com
My question is, is it correct to create a separate subdomain zone
specifically for dhcp6.example.com so example.com zone itself doesn't
have to be updated,
No, BIND 8 was broken this was also. This was fixed in BIND 9. As for
non-BIND name servers, anything goes.
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
On 1/29/11, Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
In article mailman.1566.1296284011.555.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
The
There's nothing wrong with doing that. You would create delegation NS records
in the example.com zone:
dhcp6 NS some.name.server.
dhcp6 NS other.name.server.
You can of course use the same set of name servers as are authoritative for
example.com.
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
In article mailman.1583.1296410997.555.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Chris Buxton chris.p.bux...@gmail.com wrote:
Correct, the requirement to start with a letter was removed ages ago.
Witness 3com.com, which may have been the first.
Yes, I'm pretty sure they were the impetus for the change,
What is the status of dotted hostnames - i.e. a period in the hostname
portion of a domain name ?
At one point they were allowed, I believe ? What is the latest official RFC ?
Thanks...
Vyto
- Original Message -
From: Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu
Date: Sunday, January 30, 2011
In article mailman.1586.1296424051.555.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Vytautas Grigaliunas v...@fnal.gov wrote:
What is the status of dotted hostnames - i.e. a period in the hostname
portion of a domain name ?
At one point they were allowed, I believe ? What is the latest official RFC ?
I
On Jan 30, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Vytautas Grigaliunas wrote:
What is the status of dotted hostnames - i.e. a period in the hostname
portion of a domain name ?
At one point they were allowed, I believe ? What is the latest official RFC ?
Periods, or dots, act as dividers in a domain name,
In message aanlktinnokvhtux8f9-dfgcl2lkzjfe+wmb_xxk0r...@mail.gmail.com,
Chris Buxton writes:
No, BIND 8 was broken this was also. This was fixed in BIND 9. As for
non-BIND name servers, anything goes.
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
It depended on the BIND 8 version. Running everything
On 1/30/2011 4:41 AM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
listman,
why this user has been always staying here for sending spams?
Regards.
Things happen, spammers send junk, they are then unsubscribed from the
list as soon as we notice (and get back from the weekend).
All done, user zapped.
AlanC
13 matches
Mail list logo
