When I dig this:
dig s1.mytest.blogchina.org +trace
I got many these info:
mytest.blogchina.org. 600 IN NS ns1.dnsv5.com.
mytest.blogchina.org. 600 IN NS ns2.dnsv5.com.
;; BAD (HORIZONTAL) REFERRAL
;; Received 95 bytes from 183.60.59.217#53(ns1.dnsv5.com) in 6 ms
On 7/6/2011 5:52 AM, Feng He wrote:
When I dig this:
dig s1.mytest.blogchina.org +trace
I got many these info:
mytest.blogchina.org. 600 IN NS ns1.dnsv5.com.
mytest.blogchina.org. 600 IN NS ns2.dnsv5.com.
;; BAD (HORIZONTAL) REFERRAL
;; Received 95 bytes from
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 08:23:45AM -0500,
Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote
a message of 56 lines which said:
That is not a loop at all.
I disagree. As dig clearly says, there is an horizontal referral: the
name servers are supposed to be authoritative for blogchina.org and
Hi;
I know there is a web front end to DNS stats, but I can not remember the option
in the named.conf that defines the port.
I'm running 9.8.0-P4 (just now being able to upgrade to a version that supports
the statistics)
Does anyone remember this?
--
Hal King - h...@utk.edumailto:h...@utk.edu
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, King, Harold Clyde (Hal) wrote:
I know there is a web front end to DNS stats, but I can not remember the
option in the named.conf that defines the port.
I'm running 9.8.0-P4 (just now being able to upgrade to a version that
supports the statistics)
statistics-channels
Thanks!
--
Hal King - h...@utk.edu
Systems Administrator
Office of Information Technology
Systems: Business Information Systems
The University of Tennessee
135D Kingston Pike Building
2309 Kingston Pk. Knoxville, TN 37996
Phone: 974-1599
On 7/6/11 11:15 AM, Jeremy C. Reed jr...@isc.org
saravanan subramani wrote:
Can I upgrade our existing version 9.5 to 9.8 directly or do I have to do
multiple updates.
You shouldn't need to do intermediate / multiple updates, no. You might
need to go quickly over your named.conf, zonefiles etc., to make sure they
still work with the new
Can I upgrade our existing version 9.5 to 9.8 directly or do I have to do
multiple updates.
You should have no trouble with a direct update, but if you want to be
cautious, get 9.8.0-P4, build it but don't install it, and from within
the build tree, run bin/check/named-checkconf -z on your
On 7/6/2011 4:36 AM, Vignesh Gadiyar wrote:
Got your point. I meant answer sections in the Response from the DNS
server itself. It contains 4 sections namely Question, Answer,
Authoritative and Additional sections right. I used the rrset-order in
named.conf to set order to random which was
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 07:34:22PM -0700, Evan Hunt wrote:
The key is being published now, and its activation date (i.e., when it
will start to be used to sign records) is in the near future: less than
the TTL of the DNSKEY record from now.
When the key starts signing, then someone could
Hello,
I got two different forms of AUTHORITY SECTION from the dig, for example,
$ dig mydots.net @ns7.dnsbed.com
; DiG 9.4.2-P2.1 mydots.net @ns7.dnsbed.com
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 36520
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1,
Hmm, thanks for the explanation. However, for this case, while the
activation date was in the near future, the *publish* date was far in
the past.
Apparently it thought this was the first time it was being published,
anyway. That information doesn't come from the publication date but
from
12 matches
Mail list logo
