Given the MX hosts for sympatico.ca domain:
$ dig sympatico.ca mx +short
5 mxmta.sympatico.ca.
$ dig mxmta.sympatico.ca +short
67.69.240.17
67.69.240.24
67.69.240.22
67.69.240.23
67.69.240.21
67.69.240.20
67.69.240.19
67.69.240.18
when the peer MTA fail to talk to one of these hosts,will it
On 22.07.11 16:50, Feng He wrote:
Given the MX hosts for sympatico.ca domain:
$ dig sympatico.ca mx +short
5 mxmta.sympatico.ca.
$ dig mxmta.sympatico.ca +short
67.69.240.17
67.69.240.24
67.69.240.22
67.69.240.23
67.69.240.21
67.69.240.20
67.69.240.19
67.69.240.18
when the peer MTA fail to
On 07/22/2011 09:50 AM, Feng He wrote:
Given the MX hosts for sympatico.ca domain:
$ dig sympatico.ca mx +short
5 mxmta.sympatico.ca.
$ dig mxmta.sympatico.ca +short
67.69.240.17
67.69.240.24
67.69.240.22
67.69.240.23
67.69.240.21
67.69.240.20
67.69.240.19
67.69.240.18
when the peer MTA fail
Am Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:50:35 +0800
schrieb Feng He short...@gmail.com:
Given the MX hosts for sympatico.ca domain:
$ dig sympatico.ca mx +short
5 mxmta.sympatico.ca.
$ dig mxmta.sympatico.ca +short
67.69.240.17
67.69.240.24
67.69.240.22
67.69.240.23
67.69.240.21
67.69.240.20
Thanks. this is the description:
When the lookup succeeds, the mapping can result in a list of
alternative delivery addresses rather than a single address, because
of multiple MX records, multihoming, or both. To provide reliable
mail transmission, the SMTP client MUST be able to try
Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 07/22/2011 09:50 AM, Feng He wrote:
Given the MX hosts for sympatico.ca domain:
$ dig sympatico.ca mx +short
5 mxmta.sympatico.ca.
$ dig mxmta.sympatico.ca +short
67.69.240.17 [ and several others ]
when the peer MTA fail to talk
What is the Caching issue are you facing. Bind should cache according to TTL.
Other than that I do not see much problem from Bind.
--
Paul Ooi
http://systems.takizo.com
On Jul 22, 2011, at 6:02 AM, Sathyan Arjunan (sarjunan) [CONTRACTOR] wrote:
Recent days, I am facing frequent caching
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
The question of whether a sender should attempt retries using the
different addresses of a multihomed host has been controversial. The
main argument for using the multiple addresses is that it maximizes the
probability of
On 22/07/11 14:01, Feng He wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Tony Finchd...@dotat.at wrote:
The question of whether a sender should attempt retries using the
different addresses of a multihomed host has been controversial. The
main argument for using the multiple addresses is
Hi there,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 Tony Finch quoted the RFCs thus:
The question of whether a sender should attempt retries using the
different addresses of a multihomed host has been controversial. ...
I know of at least one substantial organization which uses this kind
of thing as part of its
10 matches
Mail list logo
