Hi Gaurav,
I would use dnsperf and the 1 million website list from Alexa:
DNSPerf:
Freebsd: http://www.freshports.org/dns/dnsperf
Depending on your OS there are available ports too.
Alexa's list:
http://s3.amazonaws.com/alexa-static/top-1m.csv.zip
Did that in the past and it worked pretty wel
Dear All,
I set up a new DNS Server using Bind 9.7
For meantime I open this server for the whole world. I wanna check how many
queries it can handle.
Is this any freeware available for checking this. Is there any tool
available by which I can come to know after how much load my DNS will be
do
On Nov 2 2011, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
Note, the new .XXX TLD is included in that list.
Does that mean it is or isn't safe for work? ;-)
It depends on whether the XXX TLD acquires a signed delegation or not.
(Presumably it should, as you wouldn't want to get the *wrong* porn ...)
--
Chris Tho
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:02:45AM -0400, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
> But it does provide some alternatives:
>
> .intranet
> .internal
> .private
> .corp
> .home
> .lan
>
> But can we guarantee that they won't be approved as new public TLDs per
> the new rules adopted this summer where anything can
Bill Owens wrote on 11/02/2011 09:26:07 AM:
> I happened to be looking for some other details on mDNS yesterday
> and noticed that the current draft version of the spec reserves .local:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns-14
>This document specifies that the DN
> Note, the new .XXX TLD is included in that list.
Does that mean it is or isn't safe for work? ;-)
-JP
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.i
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 08:45:31AM -0400, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
> Lyle wrote on 11/01/2011 04:19:18 PM:
>
> > Again, this has a disadvantage if they ever decide to make .internal a
> > real internet domain name and some people frown upon this practice. Be
> > sure you know what can go wrong.
>
On Wednesday 02 November 2011 08:00:55 Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
> > Is there an IETF/ICANN reserved TLD for internal use? I've seen
> > plenty of .loc and .local, but I haven't seen an RFC reserving
.local is used in MDNS, but AFAIK the RFC is still a draft.
> > it. RFC 2606 reserves .example, .inv
> Is there an IETF/ICANN reserved TLD for internal use? I've seen plenty of
> .loc and .local, but I haven't seen an RFC reserving it. RFC 2606
> reserves .example, .invalid, .localhost and .test but these don't seem
> approriate.
Not IETF/ICANN reserved, but ISO 3166 [1] reserves the follow
Lyle wrote on 11/01/2011 04:19:18 PM:
> Again, this has a disadvantage if they ever decide to make .internal a
> real internet domain name and some people frown upon this practice. Be
> sure you know what can go wrong.
Is there an IETF/ICANN reserved TLD for internal use? I've seen plenty of
10 matches
Mail list logo
