Tarak,
You probably meant for this to go to the bind-users list, not the
bind10-users list. I have Cc'd that list here - hopefully someone can
help you out.
Cheers,
--
Shane
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 19:22 +0530, trm asn wrote:
Dear List,
Please help me out to investigate the below scenario .
Hi everyone,
I tried to find a solution to this using Google, but I failed... I'm wondering
if this is expected behavior of bind9 or if this is configurable...
I have a domain configured and my server is the authoritative name server for
this domain.
My server is reachable via IPv4 and IPv6
Now I have only one question:
On 08.11.11 20:27, trm asn wrote:
The moment I have done the rndc reload example.com, the domain and all
subdomain were became not resolvable.
what does the named's log say?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish
On 09.11.11 10:34, Beisiegel, Sven wrote:
2 records are configured like this:
dls-koe.gvs.local. 2h A 192.168.100.251
dls-koe-v6.gvs.local. 2h 2001:4dd0:f9c0:100::251
I have clients that are running with IPv4 and IPv6 address at the same
time
Dear Sven,
Client queries a name for Both A and records.
Now, the thing is NAME exist but either A or doesn't exist for this.
Then how can a server reply that no such name??
Thanks and Regards,
Gaurav Kansal
9910118448
From:
http://www.iscsolutions.com/
i almost thought you were holding a trade show in NYC.
-j___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Hello,
I have a domain with TXT record that does not fit into 255 characters,
some king of ipsec record:
sofia.dashofer.sk. 3600IN TXT X-IPsec-Server(10)=@sofia.dashofer.sk
AQNqdEjqL33Pf4MFgJYs5v4xRhEPTWouM3Ny1HfcecM+TdX+gpZ2gzIpsmB8UWsUobuJnTSJ
On 09.11.11 14:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have a domain with TXT record that does not fit into 255 characters,
some king of ipsec record:
sofia.dashofer.sk. 3600IN TXT X-IPsec-Server(10)=@sofia.dashofer.sk
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Hansen Candrawinata
hansen.candrawin...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not strictly a BIND related question, but thought someone here
probably knew the answer.
Is it valid to use IPv6/IPv4 tunnels to send DNS queries to a DNS server.
Does anyone know what the
Ya. It is totally valid.
In fact we have tested the same in our organization for giving internet
connectivity to ipv6 islands.
What tunnel do is, it basically encapsulate the ipv6 packet in ipv4 header.
So a packet reach its destination,( i.e, tunnel destination), transparently.
And at the
10 matches
Mail list logo
