On 09.12.2011 22:54, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
This is not the answer I am looking. If the parameter exists, it's must
working.
Have you tried issuing the command from a command prompt?
Yes, as I wrote, from the command line the -c option is invoked and
the bind is loading the indicated file.
During a bout of excessive boredom I created a Lua back-end for DLZ's
dlopen() driver. If anybody is interested, I've put up a short
description [1] and the source code [2]. Patches are welcome. :)
-JP
[1] http://jpmens.net/2011/12/01/lua-back-end-for-bind/
[2]
Hello, I'm running FreeBSD and I intend to install the lastest BIND
with LDAP support; my confusion is what is the difference between BIND
built with the DLZ LDAP driver and BIND built with the 'sdb'
(simplified database interface) as built in the dns/bind97-sdb port?
If these are two different
Hi,
My name servers have got many times of traffic attack.
When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server
is almost dead.
For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host sometime.
Any idea? Thanks.
Regards.
My name servers have got many times of traffic attack.
When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server
is almost dead.
For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host sometime.
Are these your authoritative or your recursive name servers? These are
2011/12/10 sth...@nethelp.no:
My name servers have got many times of traffic attack.
When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server
is almost dead.
For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host
sometime.
Are these your authoritative or your
My name servers have got many times of traffic attack.
When the large bulk of traffic is delivered to nameserver, the server
is almost dead.
For example, the attacking traffic was more than 2G to a single host
sometime.
Are these your authoritative or your recursive name servers?
In message CAA3U4eO=EbKB2ECSS4F1=ff22rpk2xcbp7qdua3autxxap8...@mail.gmail.com
, =?UTF-8?B?6aOO5rKz?= writes:
2011/12/10 Lightner, Jeff jlight...@water.com:
Is it possible to create a zone file that only contains a CNAME?
Some nameservers can setup that, though it's breaking the RFC.
Hi,
using bind 9.8.1-p1 on rhel5 i386
Having a problem with views. My intended configuration:
* most zones are identical in either view
* a few zones are added in the internal view
* networks in the internal view can do recursive queries (yeah, i know,
i'm not supposed to mix authoritative
In article mailman.507.1323556030.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message
CAA3U4eO=EbKB2ECSS4F1=ff22rpk2xcbp7qdua3autxxap8...@mail.gmail.com
, =?UTF-8?B?6aOO5rKz?= writes:
2011/12/10 Lightner, Jeff jlight...@water.com:
Is it possible to create a zone
2011/12/11 Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu:
If CloudFlare is similar to Akamai's solution, recursive servers never
see the CNAME record. Instead, when the auth server receives the query
for the A record of the apex, it performs its own query for the CNAME,
and returns the result of this.
2011/12/11 Dan Pritts da...@internet2.edu:
Hi,
using bind 9.8.1-p1 on rhel5 i386
Having a problem with views. My intended configuration:
* most zones are identical in either view
* a few zones are added in the internal view
* networks in the internal view can do recursive queries
In message barmar-072f49.19202810122...@news.eternal-september.org, Barry Mar
golin writes:
In article mailman.507.1323556030.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message
CAA3U4eO=EbKB2ECSS4F1=ff22rpk2xcbp7qdua3autxxap8...@mail.gmail.com
,
In article mailman.510.1323563868.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Ken Peng short...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/12/11 Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu:
If CloudFlare is similar to Akamai's solution, recursive servers never
see the CNAME record. Â Instead, when the auth server receives the
14 matches
Mail list logo
