I would like to switch on query logging for specific views only. Is
this possible using BIND 9.7 (or any other BIND version, for that
matter)?
The querylog option does not seem to apply to views, and it does not
appear to be possible to filter based on view in the logging phrase.
--
Florian
On 21.12.11 19:21, Peter Andreev wrote:
All these servers are slaves. They don't send notifies.
2011/12/21 Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk:
they do, unless you have turned it off...
On 22.12.11 11:54, Peter Andreev wrote:
Of course I turned it off, it's normal practice for
2012/1/2 Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk:
On 21.12.11 19:21, Peter Andreev wrote:
All these servers are slaves. They don't send notifies.
2011/12/21 Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk:
they do, unless you have turned it off...
On 22.12.11 11:54, Peter Andreev wrote:
Of
On 21.12.11 19:21, Peter Andreev wrote:
I think that if server is authoritative - and - slave-only it should
use system resolver rather than querying by itself.
2012/1/2 Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk:
BIND will not use system resolver. BIND is the resolver. Relying on other
On 1/2/2012 5:42 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 21.12.11 19:21, Peter Andreev wrote:
All these servers are slaves. They don't send notifies.
2011/12/21 Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk:
they do, unless you have turned it off...
On 22.12.11 11:54, Peter Andreev wrote:
Of
In article mailman.654.1325531095.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com wrote:
I agree with Matus. BIND should be as self-sufficient as possible, and
not make any assumptions about the capability of and/or the data it
expects to get from the system resolver
If the
On Jan 2, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
If the system resolver is good enough for every other application
running on the system, it should be good enough for BIND.
Why not at least allow this as an option?
The system resolver will happily provide answers based upon data from
On 01/02/2012 11:16, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article mailman.654.1325531095.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com wrote:
I agree with Matus. BIND should be as self-sufficient as possible, and
not make any assumptions about the capability of and/or the data it
In article mailman.656.1325532888.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 2, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
If the system resolver is good enough for every other application
running on the system, it should be good enough for BIND.
Why not
9 matches
Mail list logo