On Apr 30 2012, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Apr 26, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
[...]
From a Comcast talk at SATIN 2012 I believe they called that a negative
trust anchor, and IIRC, the author wanted to publish a draft of its
operation. Haven't seen it yet though, and it's probably off
Operational Notification -- Segmentation Fault in resolver.c
Affects BIND 9.6-ESV-R6, 9.7.5, 9.8.2, 9.9.0
Summary:
ISC has discovered a race condition in the resolver code that
can cause a recursive nameserver running BIND 9.6-ESV-R6, 9.7.5,
9.8.2, or 9.9.0 to crash with a segmentation
On 30/4/12 13:56 , Chris Thompson wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-livingood-negative-trust-anchors-01
Being actively discussed on DNSOP list
It *was* being actively discussed there, up until about 10 days ago. Since
then the participants seem to have stopped, maybe from sheer
I must be doing something wrong, because what I want to do doesn't
seem that difficult.
I have a range of IPs bound to a local interface:
lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:10.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.224
And I want to convince Bind to listen on sub-set of the given range (
Hello,
How to use nsupdate to dynamic update the SOA records?
For example, I want to update the zone's contact email and main NS
server name.
Thanks.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
In message 2a078dfa10a22fe23c0ad67b92b58...@mail.mxes.net, cloud cache writes:
Hello,
How to use nsupdate to dynamic update the SOA records?
For example, I want to update the zone's contact email and main NS
server name.
Thanks.
update add zone ttl SOA .
send
Just make sure
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Augie Schwer wrote:
I must be doing something wrong, because what I want to do doesn't
seem that difficult.
I have a range of IPs bound to a local interface:
lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:10.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.224
And I want to
Augie Schwer augie.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a range of IPs bound to a local interface:
lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:10.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.224
And I want to convince Bind to listen on sub-set of the given range (
10.0.0.2 for example )
You can't do
On 30/04/2012 23:56, Augie Schwer wrote:
I must be doing something wrong, because what I want to do doesn't
seem that difficult.
I have a range of IPs bound to a local interface:
lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:10.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.224
This means you've got
cloud cache i...@cloudcache.net wrote:
How to use nsupdate to dynamic update the SOA records?
For example, I want to update the zone's contact email and main NS server
name.
Like this:
$ dig +noall +answer soa fanf2.ucam.org
fanf2.ucam.org. 3600IN SOA black.dotat.at.
I think you've all missed the netmask there, 10.0.0.2 is in that range.
augie@augnix:~$ sudo ifconfig lo:1 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.224
augie@augnix:~$ ifconfig lo:1
lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:10.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.224
augie@augnix:~$ ping 10.0.0.2 -c 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/30/2012 04:56 PM, Augie Schwer wrote:
I must be doing something wrong, because what I want to do doesn't
seem that difficult.
I have a range of IPs bound to a local interface:
lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
inet
Thanks for the reply, please see my previous e-mail about the address
being perfectly pingable on that interface.
We run PowerDNS and Unbound with a similar interface configuration
without a problem, I'm sure Bind can too, I just need to know what the
special config. option I'm missing is.
Any
On 4/30/2012 7:14 PM, Augie Schwer wrote:
I think you've all missed the netmask there, 10.0.0.2 is in that range.
augie@augnix:~$ sudo ifconfig lo:1 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.224
Netmask says what addresses are REACHABLE on that interface, not the
addresses assigned to that interface.
On 4/30/12 4:14 PM, Augie Schwer augie.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you've all missed the netmask there, 10.0.0.2 is in that range.
augie@augnix:~$ sudo ifconfig lo:1 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.224
augie@augnix:~$ ifconfig lo:1
lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
inet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/30/2012 07:13 PM, Augie Schwer wrote:
Thanks for the reply, please see my previous e-mail about the address
being perfectly pingable on that interface.
Whats that have to do with anything? It being pingable only means
something is
In message cbc4a14e.28bd2%micho...@cisco.com, michoski writes:
On 4/30/12 4:14 PM, Augie Schwer augie.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you've all missed the netmask there, 10.0.0.2 is in that range.
augie@augnix:~$ sudo ifconfig lo:1 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.224
augie@augnix:~$
17 matches
Mail list logo