Hi,
I am new with bind.I am trying to configure bind as caching server for
our network.I configure it and it works successfully.
Can we get report or statistics something which shows which queries
resolved from cache and which resolved from internet?
bind has snmp mib for monitoring ?
Hello,
When I dig at my bind9 resolver with qtype=ANY, I find the message never
expire and being refetched until the last rrset expire, if there are several
rrsets in answer section, when one rrset in answer section expires, the
query client will get one cached message just without the expired
zhanglikun zhangli...@cnnic.cn wrote:
So my question is why bind9 do like that?
QTYPE=ANY is a special debugging facility. It just returns what is in the
cache, and only makes a query to the authoritative server when there in
nothing cached.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch d...@dotat.at
On 08/05/2012 10:09, Ben wrote:
I am new with bind.I am trying to configure bind as caching server for
our network.I configure it and it works successfully.
Can we get report or statistics something which shows which queries
resolved from cache and which resolved from internet?
Yes. Add a
-Original Message-
From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 4:54 PM
To: Bischof, Ralph F. (MSFC-IS40)[NICS]
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Inline Signing does not update SOA?
In message
1. In down level Windows, everything is OK.
2. In upper level dns(bind), ns record, and A record of nameserver is fine.
3. But A record in WIndows Server can not resolved by upper level BIND.
I think maybe I have to do something in my windows server to connect
windows with linux bind?
If
Hi Phil,
4. Create a zone for www.google.com and instead of CNAME, put an A
record at the apex with the same IP as nosslsearch.google.com. Run a
script FREQUENTLY to re-resolve the host, as Google do short-TTL
DNS-based loadbalancing.
For unbound has no solution Inow want to try your
In article mailman.713.1336489020.63724.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Tobias Krais tux-s...@design-to-use.de wrote:
Hi Phil,
4. Create a zone for www.google.com and instead of CNAME, put an A
record at the apex with the same IP as nosslsearch.google.com. Run a
script FREQUENTLY to
-%-
@ IN SOA localhost root@localhost. (
2012041100
7200
1800
1209600
On May 8 2012, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article mailman.713.1336489020.63724.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Tobias Krais tux-s...@design-to-use.de wrote:
Hi Phil,
4. Create a zone for www.google.com and instead of CNAME, put an A
record at the apex with the same IP as nosslsearch.google.com.
Sundry nitpicks. Not much of interest here, sorry.
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:38:55PM +0200, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
-%-
@ IN SOA localhost root@localhost. (
2012041100
7200
Reading the section on delegation in the O'Reilly book, I'm confused about
something: The parent is configured to delegate the subdomain to the child
with glue records, etc. But how does the child know who to ask if a host in
the subdomain requests a record in the parent zone? They don't show any
Reading the section on delegation in the O'Reilly book, I'm confused about
something: The parent is configured to delegate the subdomain to the child
with glue records, etc. But how does the child know who to ask if a host in
the
subdomain requests a record in the parent zone? They don't
On 5/8/2012 1:56 PM, Mike Bernhardt wrote:
Reading the section on delegation in the O'Reilly book, I'm confused about
something: The parent is configured to delegate the subdomain to the child
with glue records, etc. But how does the child know who to ask if a host in
the subdomain requests a
The child doesn't know it's parent and goes up to the root like any other
server would.
-Ben Croswell
On May 8, 2012 2:13 PM, Mike Bernhardt bernha...@bart.gov wrote:
Reading the section on delegation in the O'Reilly book, I'm confused about
something: The parent is configured to delegate the
In this case, the root only knows the external public server, not the
internal parent who is doing the delegating. So it would seem that slaving
the internal parent is the only solution for resolving hosts in the internal
parent domain, correct?
_
From: Ben Croswell
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:24:48PM +0200, Tobias Krais wrote:
Hi all together,
very interesting this discussion. For I am a newbie I understood only half.
Thus I detected 2 ways to continue:
I believe you can use response policy (RPZ) to achieve this. Or you can use
just about any
Another option would be zone level forwarding on the child to point at the
parent or stub zones.
-Ben Croswell
On May 8, 2012 3:59 PM, Mike Bernhardt bernha...@bart.gov wrote:
In this case, the root only knows the external public server, not the
internal parent who is doing the delegating. So
I don't think the child domain is on BIND so that may or may not be an
option. But, good idea. Thanks for your help!
_
From: Ben Croswell [mailto:ben.crosw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 1:16 PM
To: Mike Bernhardt
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: How does a child
Selective forwarding and stub zones are available in Microsoft DNS, or
so I'm told...
(Although I feel obligated to point out that this is a BIND-oriented
list, so you may not get a lot of configuration advice for Microsoft
products).
In message 3c6f299b652a4e71b1af8bbce9380...@netadmin.bart.gov, Mike
Bernhardt writes:
Reading the section on delegation in the O'Reilly book, I'm confused about
something: The parent is configured to delegate the subdomain to the child
with glue records, etc. But how does the child know who
I've gotten really annoyed at dig not taking the +do option.
Please consider applying this patch, many simple souls like me will
appreciate it a lot :)
Pauldiff -Naur bind-9.8.2-ori/bin/dig/dig.c bind-9.8.2/bin/dig/dig.c
--- bind-9.8.2-ori/bin/dig/dig.c2012-05-08 22:34:19.059392999
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:03:54PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Please consider applying this patch, many simple souls like me will
appreciate it a lot :)
Those who use +do as a shorthand for +domain won't. It'd be okay
for the value == NULL case, though.
(BTW, suggestions are best sent to
Hi Jan-Piet,
What's the hash doing there? ...^
That's not a comment.
Thanks. I continue learning...
Replace that whole line by
nosslsearch.google.com. IN A 216.239.32.20
Zone is www.google.com. That won't work here
Assuming you've configured the zone
24 matches
Mail list logo
