A lot of times we get responses that look like:
FOO.BAR CNAME EXAMPLE.BAR
EXAMPLE.BAR A 1.1.1.1
BIND currently (atleast with the default settings) when it encounters
a CNAME stops processing and checks if EXAMPLE.BAR is in cache or else
sends out another query to resolve it even though the A
A lot of times we get responses that look like:
a.b.c.d CNAME x.y.z
x.y.z IP 1.1.1.1
BIND always sends out an additional query as soon as it encounters the CNAME it
stops processing and either x.y.z. is in cache or needs another query to
respond.
Is there a setting in BIND to actually use
Stop spamming the list with essentially the same question.
comp.protocols.dns.bind and bind-us...@isc.org are bi-directionally
gatewayed.
And to answer your question. No there isn't a switch.
In message 92e42992-d0be-4d53-b0dc-866102a4e...@googlegroups.com, Srinivas Kr
ishnan writes:
A lot
On 06/29/2012 07:50 AM, Srinivas Krishnan wrote:
A lot of times we get responses that look like:
FOO.BAR CNAME EXAMPLE.BAR
EXAMPLE.BAR A 1.1.1.1
BIND currently (atleast with the default settings) when it encounters
a CNAME stops processing and checks if EXAMPLE.BAR is in cache or else
sends
Hello JT,
I'm currently working on integrating MS DNSSEC (on Windows 2012) and
BIND here @ Men Mice for another customer.
I might have a solution for you, but I need more detail information about
your setup. I will contact you by E-Mail on Monday (I hope that is not too
late).
-- Carsten
The purpose behind this is not to protect the internal AD DNS from hijacking.
But rather to allow internal clients to run DNSSEC related queries without
having to reference external resolvers.
dig +dnssec somedomain
By the way, integrating BIND into AD will not be permitted. The AD staff
Hi all,
I currently run two Bind 9.9.* nameservers (details below), I've just added
a slave zone to the Windows one, the Linux one being the master. The zone
transferred, however, seems to be corrupt in that when opened in Notepad it
contains what I can only describe as gobbledegook. The master
On 06/29/12 10:10, Danny Horne wrote:
Hi all,
I currently run two Bind 9.9.* nameservers (details below), I've just
added a slave zone to the Windows one, the Linux one being the
master. The zone transferred, however, seems to be corrupt in that
when opened in Notepad it contains what I can
Thanks Todd,
Seeing it cleanly when doing that so I guess the zone file itself is ok
On 29 June 2012 16:24, Todd Snyder tsny...@rim.com wrote:
From your slave, if you do
** **
dig @[master server] zonename AXFR
** **
Do you get nice text, or garbage?
** **
*From:*
Danny Horne da...@thelake.me wrote:
I currently run two Bind 9.9.* nameservers (details below), I've just
added a slave zone to the Windows one, the Linux one being the master.
The zone transferred, however, seems to be corrupt in that when opened
in Notepad it contains what I can only
10 matches
Mail list logo