On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 19:33 -0700, Dave Warren wrote:
On 3/13/2013 17:11, Noel Butler wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 14:43 -0700, Dave Warren wrote:
I almost wouldn't bother with SPF records these days though, except that
the code was already written.
# grep SPF maillog
King, Harold Clyde (Hal) h...@utk.edu wrote:
Is there an option for bind like the allow-recursion { network-acl }
For blocking out going records of 10.0.0.0/8 and 192.168.0.0/16 so I could do
a view like:
I'm not sure what you mean by blocking out going records but there are a
couple of
Are there relatively recent instructions on how to build BIND from source and
run it in a chroot environment? It sounds obvious but everything I've come
across assumes BIND is provided by some package manager or included with the
operating system. I'd like to build the latest version of
On Mar 14, 2013, at 3:29 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
King, Harold Clyde (Hal) h...@utk.edu wrote:
Is there an option for bind like the allow-recursion { network-acl }
For blocking out going records of 10.0.0.0/8 and 192.168.0.0/16 so I could
do a view like:
I'm not sure what you mean by
On 14 Mar 2013, at 15:57, Chris Buxton wrote:
No, I'm pretty sure the OP wants to strip records from responses if the
records are A records referring to private address space (RFC 1918).
I've no idea how you would do this.
Other than separate views, with a trimmed zone in the
On Mar 14, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
On 14 Mar 2013, at 15:57, Chris Buxton wrote:
No, I'm pretty sure the OP wants to strip records from responses if the
records are A records referring to private address space (RFC 1918).
I've no idea how you would do this.
On 14 Mar 2013, at 16:22, Chris Buxton wrote:
Well, yes, if the server in question is authoritative for all the data in
question. But if it's just a resolver, that may be more difficult.
Fair comment.
I was (perhaps naïvely) being led by my aversion to open resolvers
Hi--
On Mar 14, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Manish Rane wrote:
I right now have NS server hosted with ISP and I am planning to set up my own
BIND servers. Now I would like to understand that I need to ask my Registrar
to populate the entry of my new NS server which would take 4-6 hours to
propagate
Manish
That is a perfectly good plan. One note is to study your TTL. If
your ISP has set a longer TTL on your NS records then you would need
to first ask for a shorter TTL and wait until the time has passed.
Example: if TTL is set to one week, ask for change to shorter period
and then wait for
hmm...you are talking about SOA TTL Value?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Andrew Latham lath...@gmail.com wrote:
Manish
That is a perfectly good plan. One note is to study your TTL. If
your ISP has set a longer TTL on your NS records then you would need
to first ask for a shorter TTL
Also when my ISP DNS servers are live do I need to add mine one as a slave
ones? both?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Manish Rane manish...@gmail.com wrote:
hmm...you are talking about SOA TTL Value?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Andrew Latham lath...@gmail.com wrote:
Manish
Will my new config would look like this? will it be a Slave for my new
servers?
ns1.example.com1.2.3.4--- Master
ns2.example.com 5.6.7.8--Slave
mynewns1.example.com 20.20.20.20 -- Slave
mynewns2.example.com 30.30.30.30
Introduction
BIND 9.9.3b2 is the second beta release of BIND 9.9.3.
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.9.2 to BIND 9.9.3b2.
Please see the CHANGES file in the source code release for a
complete list of all changes.
Download
The latest versions of BIND 9 software can
With apologies to readers of this list: the announcement e-mails
for BIND 9.6-ESV-R9b2, 9.8.5b2, and 9.9.3b2 were sent to the
bind-announce list earlier this week but a typo in my shell script
incorrectly prevented the bind-users and bind-workers lists from
receiving the announcement at that
Given the that you will eventually stop using ns1 and ns2 You should probably
set up mynewns1 as the master with mynewns2 as a slave of mynewns1.
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 01:05:50 +0530
Subject: Re: How to minimize the downtime in my case
From: manish...@gmail.com
To: lath...@gmail.com
CC:
15 matches
Mail list logo
