On Mon, Mar 18, 2013, at 03:19 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
Vernon Schryver writes:
to laziness, DNS is not rocket science, I'm sure given ARM and
access to
google, a 13yo kid could get at least the basics right.
Laziness?--nonsense. Postel's Law and simple logic predict the
It does not matter where the notify comes from (it well can be sent from a
slave too), named will try to transfer the zone from the first master
listed in the masters list. At least it's how it works in 9.7.x, though I
do not believe it's something that changed between the releases.
ena
On Mon,
I'd go along with that, if they can't get their act together within 3
years, then that IS pure laziness.
I think laziness better fits answering port 443 with HTTP/TLS-SSL
and not publishing DANE RRs with existing certs or fingerprints.
The contrib/dane directory in current versions of BIND
On 2013-03-17 22:35, Doug Barton wrote:
On 3/17/2013 5:59 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
The rational course would be to set a sunset date on TXT style spf
records. April 2016 looks like a good date. 10 years after RFC
4408 was published.
+1
Unfortunately there's really no need to change
In message
CAG=4s2amwgimwvrqszjkmk74v_mmnbxohgc+ofqtjkfonjo...@mail.gmail.com, Emil
Natan writes:
It does not matter where the notify comes from (it well can be sent from a
slave too), named will try to transfer the zone from the first master
listed in the masters list. At least it's how
On 2013-03-18 15:50, Mark Andrews wrote:
Named will transfer from the master with the highest serial. Notify
just triggers early refresh checks.
Does it actually check each master for a serial number, or does it stop
at the first one queried if it has a higher-than-current serial number?
In message 201303181535.r2ifz8ga017...@calcite.rhyolite.com, Vernon Schryver
writes:
} Turning off lookup for TXT record lookup for SPF would have very
} little negative impact. You would have some additional spoofed
} email getting through and some additional blow back (which could
} be
At 08:35 18-03-2013, Vernon Schryver wrote:
Also, those who are not lazy, who think RFC 4408bis is wrong, and want
to use type 99 without violating RFC 4408bis will go to the IEFF.
I suggest reading the messages with a subject line of #9: RFC 4408
SPF RR type in the mail archive at
Using BIND 9.8.2
When you setup Samba 4 AD DC using BIND9_DLZ and your domain has external
servers (eg: www,mail) at external providers
this means that the ISP and the internal network nameservers will both have SOA
record for the domain.
/etc/resolv.conf looks like this:
domain
2013/3/19 Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net:
Using BIND 9.8.2
When you setup Samba 4 AD DC using BIND9_DLZ and your domain has external
servers (eg: www,mail) at external providers
this means that the ISP and the internal network nameservers will both have
SOA record for the domain.
On 03/18/2013 08:32 PM, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
2013/3/19 Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net:
Using BIND 9.8.2
When you setup Samba 4 AD DC using BIND9_DLZ and your domain has external
servers (eg: www,mail) at external providers
this means that the ISP and the internal network nameservers will
On Mar 18, 2013, at 20.27, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Using BIND 9.8.2
When you setup Samba 4 AD DC using BIND9_DLZ and your domain has external
servers (eg: www,mail) at external providers
this means that the ISP and the internal network nameservers will both have
SOA record
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:52 -0700, SM wrote:
SPF RR type
Had a bit of a read of that thread, and the most noise comes from a guy
who should know better, but doesn't, Mr Kitterman repeatedly says If
it's all so obvious that it makes sense to publish SPF records, why
aren't more people doing
On 03/18/2013 10:25 PM, b...@bitrate.net wrote:
On Mar 18, 2013, at 20.27, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Using BIND 9.8.2
When you setup Samba 4 AD DC using BIND9_DLZ and your domain has external
servers (eg: www,mail) at external providers
this means that the ISP and the internal
In message 5147d5ae.5050...@verizon.net, Gerry Reno writes:
If it was more than just a few labels I would do it another way.
But this will suffice, if I can only get bind to actually get the forward zon
e working.
I don't need any delegation. I'm not looking to slave the zone.
I just
15 matches
Mail list logo
