Not everyone has the same software infrastructure, and not everyone has
the same visual proficiency. For this reason a Subject Prefix helps on
manage much messages on inbox.
I don't understand why the Subject Prefix can be inconvenient for
someone, if it's brief.
Al 06/06/13 01:11, En/na Stuart
Dears,
I was receiving the below warning event :
Event Type:Warning
Event Source:named
Event Category:None
Event ID:2
Date:6/5/2013
Time:11:01:30 AM
User:N/A
Computer:DNS01
Description:
client 10.0.11.162#62089: RFC 1918 response from Internet for
In message dub101-ds17938d7e8867dfe699b6edc2...@phx.gbl, Eng_M.wahab writes
:
Dears,
I was receiving the below warning event :
Event Type:Warning
Event Source:named
Event Category:None
Event ID:2
Date:6/5/2013
Time:11:01:30 AM
User:N/A
Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 06/05/2013 11:33 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
I believe the ANY hack on mail servers was a Sendmailism 20ish years ago.
s/Send/q/
No, I meant Sendmail - see http://fanf.livejournal.com/10.html
Sendmail at one time tried to use ANY for combined MX+A
Vernon Schryver v...@rhyolite.com wrote:
[ANY query for combined MX/A lookup was] a bad hack then and it
has remained a bad hack :-)
I would not agree if you could rely on the open resolvers continuing
to do what they're doing, if you didn't care about parsing 3 or 4
KBytes of irrelevant
Thanks Mark,
It works in a perfect way ;)
As for the below error, does it have anything to do with the RFC 1918 issue
or it's another issue ?
Event Type:Error
Event Source:named
Event Category:None
Event ID:1
Date:6/6/2013
Time:12:09:44 PM
User:N/A
The brackets were wrong and we should have checked that obj was true.
The patch you provided makes the log message go away. The bind9 service
appears to be working normally, and named-checkconf produces no output.
Thanks. Jeff.
FYI. The patch for /lib/bind9/check.c provided earlier in this
In message dub101-ds177bb02f419f2957ff9507c2...@phx.gbl, Eng_M.wahab writes
:
Thanks Mark,
It works in a perfect way ;)
As for the below error, does it have anything to do with the RFC 1918 issue
or it's another issue ?
Event Type:Error
Event Source:named
Event Category:
Thnkx one more time Mark , It's wrong behavior so I keep the default
settings.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Andrews
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 2:27 PM
To: Eng_M.wahab
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: RFC 1918 Warning Event ID 2
In message
-Original Message-
From: Elmar K. Bins e...@4ever.de
Organization: unorganized since 1789
Date: Thursday, June 6, 2013 6:18 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: This list's prefix
s...@resistor.net (SM) wrote:
And the 100-dollar-question is: How do you
Hello Carsten and Kevin
Thanks for your answers. As a short summary, I will use (and recommend) the
following ways:
- consider .local/.loc/.intra/.lan etc. as legacy which should be eliminated
(Microsoft officially supports Active Directory domain renaming procedures
for that).
- preferred
In article mailman.488.1370508226.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
The ANY query does not trigger alias processing, so if there is a CNAME
chain you have to follow it yourself. This is a waste because if you made
an MX query in the first place the server would
Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
In article mailman.488.1370508226.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
The ANY query does not trigger alias processing, so if there is a CNAME
chain you have to follow it yourself. This is a waste because if you made
an
Is there any way to build BIND 9.9.3-P1 on Solaris 10 with 'cc', using
OpenSSL built with 'gcc'?
There are many other packages that use OpenSSL that only build with
'gcc', but BIND 9.9.3-P1 won't compile on Solaris 10 with 'gcc' (I think
it did previously, as my notes have 'CC=gcc' set in the
From: Tony Finch d...@dotat.at
Sendmail at one time tried to use ANY for combined MX+A lookups, which
doesn't work.
That would be true and relevant if sendmail did that. Requesting ANY,
not getting all of the MX, A, and/or records needed, and failing
to continue making other DNS
Vernon Schryver v...@rhyolite.com wrote:
About chasing CNAMEs safely or otherwise, please recall the somewhat
controversial DontExpandCnames. The current cf/README says:
confDONT_EXPAND_CNAMES DontExpandCnames
[False] If set, $[ ... $] lookups that
Supported in this case means accept bug reports for not we know
it won't work.
Mark
In message 51b0ba26.9030...@noc.utoronto.ca, Mike Peterson writes:
Is there any way to build BIND 9.9.3-P1 on Solaris 10 with 'cc', using
OpenSSL built with 'gcc'?
There are many other packages that use
17 matches
Mail list logo
