Hi I'm using centos-6.3 and I install bind9 on it by using (./configre, make,
make install)
How can I test if Bind is installed correctly ( I tried service named status
but I received the error message named :unrecognized)
Nidal
On Aug 27, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Nidal Shater ngiw2...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi I'm using centos-6.3 and I install bind9 on it by using (./configre, make,
make install)
How can I test if Bind is installed correctly ( I tried service named
status but I received the error message named
On Aug 27, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Nidal Shater ngiw2...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have tried named -g but an I have received the error message
loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf'
/etc/named.conf:63: open: /etc/named.rfc1912.zones: file not found
loading configuration: file not found
hi
when I install BIND,,,BIND won't install the /etc/named.conf file why ??? I
think bind has problems with centos6.3
could anybody figure it out
PS: I use (./configure ,make, make install ) to install it
On Aug 27, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Nidal Shater ngiw2...@hotmail.com wrote:
why the file named.conf didn't indtalled in /etc,,, is there something wrong
with BIND9 ,,did you have any link that have a trusted bind9 for centos6.3
AND thanks.
BIND does not install configuration files when you do
This was answered in the other thread, you need to create your own
config file when installing from source.
Steve
On 27 August 2013 17:02, Nidal Shater ngiw2...@hotmail.com wrote:
hi
when I install BIND,,,BIND won't install the /etc/named.conf file why ??? I
think bind has problems with
-Original Message-
From: Nidal Shater ngiw2...@hotmail.com
Date: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 12:02 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: /etc/named.conf won't be installed !!
hi
when I install BIND,,,BIND won't install the /etc/named.conf file why ???
I think
From: Colin Harvey colinedwardhar...@yahoo.com
My environment is firewalled from the real world. For queries on
zones to which I'm not master, I want to recurse to a corporate
server. nslookup some.internal.hostname.com
internal.corporate.server works fine. Setting . to use this
Thanks. But I already have that option for the internal.hostname.com zone.
Still not seeing traffic going to 192.168.1.1.
Colin
From: wbr...@e1b.org wbr...@e1b.org
To: Colin Harvey colinedwardhar...@yahoo.com
Cc: bind users bind-users@lists.isc.org;
On Aug 27, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Nidal Shater ngiw2...@hotmail.com wrote:
I create named.conf by my self
and then when I type named -g
it tolds me that named.ca :not found ,,, what that means ??
It means you typed in a sample without knowing what it does. I'll take a wild
guess and say
dig +trace host.internal.hostname.com responds with a list of authoritative
nameservers for the zone and the error dig: couldn't get address for
ns1.corporate.hostname.com where the error cycles through all four of the
authoritative nameservers.
Also ns1.corporate.hostname.com is not
Greetings,
I'm upgrading my bind installation on one of my hosts, and everything
seems to be working properly although I'm getting a permissions
error/warning in the log on startup:
Aug 27 14:24:45 flotsam named[13746]: Required root permissions to open
'/var/run/named.pid'.
Aug 27 14:24:45
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 16:02 +, Nidal Shater wrote:
when I install BIND,,,BIND won't install the /etc/named.conf file why
??? I think bind has problems with centos6.3
You might want to try an RPM install:
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind
On 8/27/2013 1:07 PM, Colin Harvey wrote:
My environment is firewalled from the real world. For queries on
zones to which I'm not master, I want to recurse to a corporate
server. nslookup some.internal.hostname.com
internal.corporate.server works fine.
nslookup is a terrible DNS
/var/run/named.pid and /var/run/named/session.key need to be writable
by named. Additionally their parent directories need to be writable
by named so the files can be removed on shutdown. The files are
not writable by named.
-rw-r--r-- 1 root named6 Aug 27 14:35 named.pid
John,
You should see if your full root on the box what permissions named
has as a group and what the (bind/named) user has. If your running some
restricting permissions via the sudoers you may need to lighten up to 775
from the chroot'd directory down giving the ownership the named group
16 matches
Mail list logo