Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <528ec4db.6060...@hpl.hp.com>, Andris Kalnozols writes:
>> Hi, Mark.
>>
>> I've also seen the same problem which occurs with AXFR queries
>> to both Windows server 2003 and 2012:
>>
>> Win2003
>> ---
>>> ;; Got bad packet: extra input data
>>> 115 bytes
>>> e9 f
In message <528ec4db.6060...@hpl.hp.com>, Andris Kalnozols writes:
> Hi, Mark.
>
> I've also seen the same problem which occurs with AXFR queries
> to both Windows server 2003 and 2012:
>
> Win2003
> ---
> > ;; Got bad packet: extra input data
> > 115 bytes
> > e9 f3 80 80 00 01 00 01 00 00
Hi, Mark.
I've also seen the same problem which occurs with AXFR queries
to both Windows server 2003 and 2012:
Win2003
---
> ;; Got bad packet: extra input data
> 115 bytes
> e9 f3 80 80 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 00 04 6c 61 62 .lab
> 73 03 68 70 6c 02 68 70 03 63 6f 6d 00 00
In message <1385060190.20266.50452509.48b1a...@webmail.messagingengine.com>,
jen...@promessage.com writes:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013, at 10:38 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > RRL is included in 9.9.4 already. Deployed and working here.
>
> as specified @
>
> http://ss.vix.su/~vjs/rrlrpz.html
>
> ...
>
In message <1f415f5e-7623-4e44--0bd394442...@gmail.com>, Cipher Nix writes:
> Thanks for the quick response. "dig +noedns" did it. Thank you.
It still should not have resulted in a "extra input data".
It would be useful to see the hex dump of the dns message
that triggered the "extra input
So does this mean there could be a Kindle edition of it?
Having impulsively snapped up a new Kindle Paperwhite (2nd Gen) for $19 (WiFi
only), when I originally had no plans to do so...since I had only jumped in
on using the first gen Kindle Paperwhite 3G a few months ago (before that I
had a K
> What about the information from top? When comparing RHEL5 and RHEL6 systems,
> I would compare the total CPU usage of the server (out of 100% not 2400% or
> 1600%).
>
> Since the hardware is different, comparing a 16 named threads on a 16 core
> box at ???MHz against a 24 core box with 24 named t
On 21/11/13 14:57, - wrote:
Are others seeing the named process run at 130-180% on RHEL 6? We've
No. Our RHEL6 boxes rune fine.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
On 21/11/2013 18:38, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:33:18AM -0800,
jen...@promessage.com wrote:
Seems the question pops up with every bind release; this time I
waited for at least a couple of weeks since the bind release.
Anyone know what's happening with the RPZ2+RRL patches f
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013, at 10:38 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> RRL is included in 9.9.4 already. Deployed and working here.
as specified @
http://ss.vix.su/~vjs/rrlrpz.html
...
BIND9 9.9.4
file rpz2+rl-9.9.4.patch, version 9.9.4-rpz2+rl.13269.14
Version 9.9.4 includes RRL with ./configure --ena
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:43:40PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:27:59PM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > Looking at the HTML source for the Table of Contents, it seems
> > like someone had this idea before but didn't follow through.
> > There are numerous links to plain-languag
Thanks for the quick response. "dig +noedns" did it. Thank you.
> On Nov 20, 2013, at 22:09, Evan Hunt wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:46:40PM -0500, cypher Nix wrote:
>> Bind 9.9.x is able to perform zone transfers from the Windows DC
>> without any issue. Performing a named-checkzone
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:33:18AM -0800,
jen...@promessage.com wrote:
> Seems the question pops up with every bind release; this time I
> waited for at least a couple of weeks since the bind release.
>
> Anyone know what's happening with the RPZ2+RRL patches for bind
> 9.9.4-P1?
RRL is inclu
Hi,
Seems the question pops up with every bind release; this time I waited
for at least a couple of weeks since the bind release.
Anyone know what's happening with the RPZ2+RRL patches for bind
9.9.4-P1?
I've tried repeatedly to subscribe to the dns firewalls list to ask
this, but never get a co
What version of BIND did you have on RHEL5? Does your RHEL6 named get any
better if you try ‘-U #’ (where # is half or less your cpu count)?
_S
On Nov 21, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 21/11/13 14:57, - wrote:
>
>> Are others seeing the named process run at 130-180% on RHEL 6? We'v
Phil Mayers wrote the following on 11/21/2013 9:35 AM:
On 21/11/13 14:57, - wrote:
Are others seeing the named process run at 130-180% on RHEL 6? We've
No. Our RHEL6 boxes rune fine.
Fine here as well...
Here is a decently busy CentOS 6 system w/ latest BIND from RPM, 2x Xeon
CPU E5-2640
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> Chapter 6 is the comprehensive configuration reference. What I'd like
> to see is more (and plain-language, consistent) hyperlinking. The
> basic idea is that any named.conf setting could be found at an
> anchor:
>
> Bv9ARM.ch06.html#that-setting
Yes th
On 21/11/13 17:30, Sean Channel wrote:
What version of BIND did you have on RHEL5? Does your RHEL6 named get
any better if you try ‘-U #’ (where # is half or less your cpu
count)?
We moved from RHEL5 9.8.3 to RHEL6 9.8.3, and saw no performance change.
We then upgraded through various versions
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> The daunting part is that I'm not sure what this will do:
>
> some-named.conf-setting
>
> ...
> See
>
> ... because at this point, it looks like the only anchors are in
> section headers. Perhaps more code will have to be added to properly
> deal with
On 21 November 2013 02:55, Davis, Donald W wrote:
> A correction. There is only a single IP address for this server.
You can either put an A record in each zone pointing to the IP address
of the server "red" or you can put an A record in the primary zone
which the server is a member of and a CNAM
20 matches
Mail list logo
