For reference:
BIND 9.9.4-P1
CentOS 6.4
64bit arch
We use RPZ to CNAME all of the “bad” domains over to a catch-all type server
that can display a message to the user. Until recently it has been working
perfectly (or we thought it was :-P ).
The problem:
RPZ appears to have stopped working
I have an issue happening here. I actually do have a vague idea what it is but
I am not real sure how is happening and how to avoid it. I was doing a research
the other day and landed on this domain;
p3net.net
I found a little strange when I logged into this domain because rather than
seeing
On Jan 10, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Howard, Christopher Bryan
christopher-how...@utc.edu wrote:
For reference:
BIND 9.9.4-P1
CentOS 6.4
64bit arch
We use RPZ to CNAME all of the “bad” domains over to a catch-all type server
that can display a message to the user. Until recently it has been
On Jan 10, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Eduardo Bonsi beart...@pacbell.net wrote:
I have an issue happening here. I actually do have a vague idea what it is
but I am not real sure how is happening and how to avoid it. I was doing a
research the other day and landed on this domain;
p3net.net
Yes,
On 2014-01-10 12:25, Alan Clegg wrote:
On Jan 10, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Eduardo Bonsi beart...@pacbell.net wrote:
I have an issue happening here. I actually do have a vague idea what it is but
I am not real sure how is happening and how to avoid it. I was doing a research
the other day and
From: Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com
Yes, it seems that they have an A record for that label that
provides the IP address 127.0.0.1.
You probably want to ask the owner of the zone about this, as I?m
not sure what the community can do about it.
They have an MX record, so perhaps the domain is
On 2014-01-10 12:36, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
From: Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com
Yes, it seems that they have an A record for that label that
provides the IP address 127.0.0.1.
You probably want to ask the owner of the zone about this, as I?m
not sure what the community can do about it.
They have
I¹ve just been using the RPZ built into BIND. I don¹t think I was aware
of RPZ 2.
-Christopher
On 1/10/14, 3:23 PM, Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com wrote:
On Jan 10, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Howard, Christopher Bryan
christopher-how...@utc.edu wrote:
For reference:
BIND 9.9.4-P1
CentOS 6.4
64bit
-Original Message-
From: Dave Warren da...@hireahit.com
Date: Friday, January 10, 2014 at 15:47
To: Bind Users bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Sites that points their A Record to localhost
On 2014-01-10 12:36, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
From: Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com
Yes, it seems
Thanks everyone for the input on this matter!
Dave Warren said:
...And less A records if they don't intend to do anything but email. But
it's an imperfect world.
No doubt it is! Like I said, it is not a big deal! Is not that people are able
to re-route anything. That just happens because my
On 01/10, Eduardo Bonsi wrote:
I know how it is happening and my concern was if that could generate
any technical or security problems on my site.
no
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
On 2014-01-10 15:01, Eduardo Bonsi wrote:
...
It seems like they have their domain configuration A Record pointed
to the localhost. We all know that the localhost is not routable
outside of the internet. Therefore I am sure their website cannot
resolve out of the 127.0.0.1.
In addition to that,
12 matches
Mail list logo
