Re: Can we do a sub-domain delegation with godaddy?

In article mailman.2063.1389807192.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Blason R blaso...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Folks, I am not sure if this is an appropriate forum to answer since more or less it is pertaining to Go

How to deny update of statically assgined a/ptr records?

Hello. I have dynamic zone. And A record in it: Example(pseudo-code): *zone myzone.* * a 10.0.0.1 domain xxx* Then I made DHCP update for host host.myzone. and it receives address from dynamic range (10.0.0.10-10.0.0.100), for example: 10.0.0.10. So host.myzone. has 2 A records: 10.0.0.1

Re: Sites that points their A Record to localhost

On 01/15, Bill Owens wrote: On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 07:55:44PM -0500, Kevin Darcy wrote: Loopback is anti-social; an apparent attempt to make the client waste resources connecting to itself. In legal terms, one might call this an attractive nuisance. You're quite right; that's why I have

RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

Am I correct in understanding that the change to enabled by default was in 9.9.x, not in 9.8.x? The 9.9.x specifically states that is enabled by default whereas the 9.8.x documentation does not. -Original Message- From: Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. [mailto:lkc...@ksu.edu] Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

Sorry for the double post, but I forgot to ask this: And if it is indeed enabled regardless of my RFC1918 ranges, I would imagine that for my internal servers which have those ranges, I would want to add disable-empty-zone .; to my global options? And for my external-facing server which of course

Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

-Original Message- From: Mike Bernhardt bernha...@bart.gov Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 Sorry for the double post, but I forgot to ask this: And if it is indeed enabled regardless