On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:57:08AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> SIGCHASE is a external contribution that is provide "as is" to dig.
> The reason that you have to explicitly define it is that ISC hasn't
> fully gone through the code to find bugs like this in it and it
> basically needs a full re-wri
BIND 9.10.0b1 has been released and is now available from:
http://www.isc.org/downloads
At ISC we are quite excited about the long list of new
features and feature improvements in this major release
and we hope that you'll share our enthusiasm.
We'd particularly like to hear from DNS operators
Hmmm, so that explains what I'm seeing in my logs of my nameservers
getting hammered by AD.
Should I be worried? Is there anything that could be done on my end to
help reduce the impact?
On our campus, we have always allowed delegation of subdomains to
department nameservers, with the requ
If you have zone-transfer permission, make a stealth slave. That, plus a
static-stub definition on your "local" server, and you're set.
Or, to simplify things even further, make the "local" server the stealth
slave (this makes some assumptions about your connectivity to the
authoritative names
Sorry. My description isn't very clear.
The local dns server isn't a stealth slave. I need a stealth slave and the
local dns server can query it when all public NSs are out of service.
Thanks!
Guanghua
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:41:03 -0500
> From: Kevin Darcy
> To: bind-users@lists.isc
Hey guys,
sorry for the delay, i urgently had to take some days off last week.
Anyways, thanks for all your help, i appreciate this a lot.
I will now try to use only one DC as a master.
a last question, Do you also run monitoring software on bind? and if so,
what or how do you monitor?
Am
6 matches
Mail list logo
