Hi there,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Michael McNally wrote:
At ISC we are quite excited about the long list of new features and ...
I don't want to rain on your parade, and I know that this is likely to
be contentious, but I would just like to ask all at ISC (and I know it
isn't necessary, but
Noticed some zones weren't transferring, so I tried to see what was up. The
logs show its polling the published master (one of my secondaries), which
fails since it doesn't have the zone yet. None of my secondaries have it
yet.
I was on vacation when the domains were set up, though I had
On 26/02/14 14:57, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
How can I get an initial transfer of the zone from a stealth master? Or
do I have to wait to get the administrator of the master to give it
another kick?
rndc retransfer?
___
Please visit
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:44:37PM +, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Many of us seek no excitement at all in our working day.
We're here for you, too. BIND 9.9 is an extended support version,
it won't reach end-of-life until at least 2017, and we won't add new
features to it unless there's a darned
Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. lkc...@ksu.edu wrote:
Hmmm, so that explains what I'm seeing in my logs of my nameservers
getting hammered by AD.
Should I be worried? Is there anything that could be done on my end to
help reduce the impact?
On our campus, we have always allowed delegation of
Guess I had something wrong in my named.conf, just now 'rndc retransfer'
worked, because after some change at 2:04pm it tried more
IPsincluding the actual master
I suppose I should've expected to see it continue to attempt to refresh
the zone, as it started doing for another zone I had
On 02/26/14 10:01, Evan Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:44:37PM +, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Many of us seek no excitement at all in our working day.
We're here for you, too. BIND 9.9 is an extended support version,
it won't reach end-of-life until at least 2017, and we won't add new
On 02/26/2014 05:48 PM, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
Except that security patches haven't been going into BIND 4 for some time
probably because BIND4 has been deprecated since 2007. BIND8 was
deprecated in 2008. BIND 9.4 was deprecated in 2008 with the last
release of 9.4-ESV in 2012. the
Over 2 weeks ago begins flood. A lot of queries:
niqcs.www.84822258.com
vbhea.www.84822258.com
abpqeftuijklm.www.84822258.com
adcbefmzidmx.www.84822258.com
and many others.
Bind answers with Server failure. On high load (4 qps) all normal
client can get Servfail on good query. Or query can
Hi Dmitry,
If your problem is a lot of strange queries, then there is two ways:
1. You operate an open resolver. If you can - restrict it to a limited
scope of clients, otherwise the only way you can lower number of incoming
queries is DPI;
2. You operate a non-open resolver. Then you can find
10 matches
Mail list logo
