Earlier this week, the OpenSSL project (http://openssl.org) announced
CVE-2014-0160, disclosing a very serious security flaw in the OpenSSL
library, affecting versions 1.0.1 and 1.0.2-beta (including OpenSSL
1.0.1f and 1.0.2-beta1) In many stories, this vulnerability is being
referred to as the
Apologies if this has been discussed; I searched the archives and didn't find
anything.
I'd like to know why the search and domain settings in the Windows
%systemroot%\system32\drivers\etc\resolv.conf don't seem to make a difference.
Anyone know?
Thanks.
Fred Woodbridge
On Apr 11 2014, Frederic Woodbridge wrote:
Apologies if this has been discussed; I searched the archives and didn't find
anything.
I'd like to know why the search and domain settings in the Windows
%systemroot%\system32\drivers\etc\resolv.conf don't seem to make a difference.
Anyone know?
Hello -
Is it possible to enable inline signing of a zone in 2 different views with 2
different keys?
I have the following config:
view external {
match-clients {
1.1.1.1;
};
zone test.com. {
type master;
file external.test.com.;
allow-update {
On Apr 9, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Steven Carr wrote:
However, assuming you are using views on the same IP address and not
splitting it across internal/external servers as that would screw up
NS records), you can reuse the same zone file so those zones that
appear in both internal and external views
On 11 Apr 2014, at 18:59, John Wobus jw...@cornell.edu wrote:
On Apr 9, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Steven Carr wrote:
However, assuming you are using views on the same IP address and not
splitting it across internal/external servers as that would screw up
NS records), you can reuse the same zone file
On 04/11/2014 10:59 AM, John Wobus wrote:
My understanding has been that two views that are masters for
a zone can safely share a zone file if the zone isn't dynamic (e.g.
dnsupdate, dnssec auto signing, etc), but that two views of
a slave zone shouldn't do that: you could have two
different
7 matches
Mail list logo
