Set the masterfile-format. Slaves default to raw,
masters default to text.
masterfile-format ( text | raw );
Mark
In message <535f4bb2.6000...@theo-andreou.org>, Theodotos Andreou writes:
> Hello to all,
>
> I have a task to clone a black box IPAM to a bind DNS
Hello to all,
I have a task to clone a black box IPAM to a bind DNS server. Actually
the black box is using bind in the backend but the manufacturer does not
provide any shell access. Only a crappy GUI. So I do not have access to
the text zone files. Just the GUI.
In order to clone all the z
hi kevin,
Stealth slaves can't be used as backup NS server. This backup server can't be
accessed by all internet users.
It can only be accessed by users from one ISP. It's used when all authority
NSs are down, especially in case of DDoS attack.
Guanghua Hou
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon,
On Apr 28, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Baird, Josh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently use the Men & Mice DNS/IPAM/DHCP suite which is essentially a
> front-end "wrapper" for BIND. We deploy our own BIND boxes and simply
> install the Men & Mice agent on them which allows us to centrally manage the
> zones
I misspoke a bit about DNSSEC. That's not an OS-level thing (unless you
want to hook in an HSM or something like that), so there's no reason to
think that an appliance-based solution would be better at it than an
agent/wrapper-based solution.
- Kevin
On
Kevin,
No - our DNS servers do only one thing depending on their role - either to
serve internal clients (caching/recursive/override external authoritative) or
to serve authoritative external clients. I used to cringe at these appliance
based solutions because I want to be in control of BIND a
Are you running *other*, non-network-service functions on these boxes
besides BIND/M&M? If not, then you might find an appliance-based
solution like Bluecat or Infoblox might be more cost-effective than
adding a DNS-management layer to a generic server. Your security folks
should love you too,
Cisco (apply liberal amounts of salt considering my FROM) has a product
suite called Prime, one piece of which is CNR (unless it's been renamed
again this week) -- Cisco Network Registrar, which handles the IPAM piece
and has DHCP and DNS components as well. CNR can integrate with BIND (as
well as
Josh,
In addition to the appliance-only vendor solutions you mention below, you may
wish look into the BT Diamond IP product line. This is an enterprise and
service provider IPAM solution with full support for DNS and DHCP. It is
available as software-only, with a centralized management compon
Ray,
Overall, M&M has worked quite nicely for us. The CLI leaves a lot to be
desired though and we have found several bugs in the application throughout the
past several years (who doesn't have bugs, though?). I have also had a hard
time getting someone on their Sales team to answer my questi
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 04:31:28PM +, Baird, Josh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently use the Men & Mice DNS/IPAM/DHCP suite which is
> essentially a front-end "wrapper" for BIND. We deploy our own BIND
> boxes and simply install the Men & Mice agent on them which allows us
> to centrally manage th
Hi,
We currently use the Men & Mice DNS/IPAM/DHCP suite which is essentially a
front-end "wrapper" for BIND. We deploy our own BIND boxes and simply install
the Men & Mice agent on them which allows us to centrally manage the zones from
a GUI (or CLI) based interface.
I'm curious about the ot
I'm not sure this makes sense from an architectural standpoint. If all
of the authoritative NSes are down, where is this "backup nameserver"
getting its data from, and how current is that data?
If slightly *stale* data is acceptable, in the absence of all
authoritative NSes, then why not just
You are cross compiling. You need to set BUILD_* so that the host tools
are properly built.
% grep BUILD README
BUILD_CC
BUILD_CFLAGS (optional)
BUILD_CPPFLAGS (optional)
BUILD_LDFLAGS (optional)
BUILD_LIBS (optional)
%
Mark
In mess
We have a remote site that we are providing a bind package for. They want a
targeted build and sent us the compile options as
-xtarget=T3 -xarch=sparcvis3 -xchip=ultraT3 -xcache=8/16/4:6144/64/24
The build system is using Sun Studio 12.3 cc on T5140 (UtltraSPARC-T2+
hardware running Solaris 1
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 03:30:40AM +, houguanghua wrote:
> Does bind support backup nameserver? This nameserver isn't
> regeristered and not accessed in normal situation. Only when
> all authority NSs is down, this backup nameserver will be
> accessed by Local DNS server.
I guess what you wan
16 matches
Mail list logo