Please don't reply to a message on the list and change the subject line.
Doing so causes your new topic to show under the previous one for
those using mail readers that thread properly, and may cause your
message to be missed altogether if someone has blocked that thread.
Instead, save the
On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 09:45:56 +1000,Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
It takes years to do transitions like this. TXT to SPF was actually
ramping up but that is now water under the bridge.
In that case named-compilezone should no longer emit
found SPF/TXT record but no SPF/SPF record found,
On 04/06/2014 08:25, Claudia Koch wrote:
Hello,
I've a installation of bind 9.4.0 with dlz_mysql_driver and I have a
zone test.de. In this zone I have a record
*.dev IN A 1.2.3.4
With dig a.dev.test.de I've get the answer 1.2.3.4.
Now I like to do a update to debian 7.0 and I compile
On 02/06/2014 23:38, John Miller wrote:
So... without stub zones, you know the drill: your local resolver
follows delegation, starting from the root nameservers. Delegation
happens, and life is good. If you're running views, then things work
fine as well: your view just needs to be
Hi
another thing i noticed while debug the cisco zone-transfer troubles:
ns1.thelounge.net and ns2.thelounge.net are
authoritative for both domains:
* thelounge.net
* rhsoft.net
MASTER: ns2.thelounge.net
SLAVE: ns1.thelounge.net
why does in case of asking the slave always come a
WARNING:
On 06.06.14 11:50, Cathy Almond wrote:
And not forgetting that with recent versions of BIND, you have 'stub'
and you have 'static-stub'.
The difference is that with static-stub, if the NS/A/ records
returned by the authoritative server you've pointed your resolver at
don't match the
On 06.06.14 13:13, Reindl Harald wrote:
why does in case of asking the slave always come a
WARNING: recursion requested but not available
even if you dig a A-record he is authoritative?
because you request recursion and the server does not provide it.
use dig +norecurse not to request
Am 06.06.2014 13:28, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 06.06.14 13:13, Reindl Harald wrote:
why does in case of asking the slave always come a
WARNING: recursion requested but not available
even if you dig a A-record he is authoritative?
because you request recursion and the server does
On 06/06/14 12:35, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.06.2014 13:28, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 06.06.14 13:13, Reindl Harald wrote:
why does in case of asking the slave always come a
WARNING: recursion requested but not available
even if you dig a A-record he is authoritative?
because you
Am 06.06.2014 13:40, schrieb Phil Mayers:
On 06/06/14 12:35, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.06.2014 13:28, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 06.06.14 13:13, Reindl Harald wrote:
why does in case of asking the slave always come a
WARNING: recursion requested but not available
even if you dig
In article mailman.371.1402054553.26362.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 06.06.2014 13:28, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 06.06.14 13:13, Reindl Harald wrote:
why does in case of asking the slave always come a
WARNING: recursion requested but
On 6/6/2014 7:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.06.2014 13:28, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 06.06.14 13:13, Reindl Harald wrote:
why does in case of asking the slave always come a
WARNING: recursion requested but not available
even if you dig a A-record he is authoritative?
because you
Am 06.06.2014 20:20, schrieb Kevin Darcy:
On 6/6/2014 7:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.06.2014 13:28, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 06.06.14 13:13, Reindl Harald wrote:
why does in case of asking the slave always come a
WARNING: recursion requested but not available
even if you dig
Halo,
in recent week we have see fill daemon_log of this errors, is way to fix?
I do wrong?
socket.c:5367: unexpected error:
Jun 2 05:43:53 korali named[2951]: connect(fe80::#53) 22/Invalid argument
___
Please visit
Not a BSD user, but are you running any sort of extra security
enforcement toolsets?
PIE is IIRC, Position Independent Executable.
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 19:27 -0400, Rick Dicaire wrote:
Hi folks, in trying to update bind 9.8.7_15 on freebsd 8.4, I get the
following:
...
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 12:18 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:
Given the heated and bitter debates over the SPF record type (see
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/maillist.html,
search SPF, around August of last year), I'm thinking that a couple
years probably translates into
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 13:35 +1000, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
Halo,
in recent week we have see fill daemon_log of this errors, is way to
fix?
I do wrong?
you are doing nothing wrong, the idiot advertising fe80 is the one doing
it wrong
in the meantime you could add to your named.conf -
17 matches
Mail list logo
