One question about 'Stealth servers'

Dear all, As a beginner of BIND, I'm writing to ask one question about 'Stealth servers'. To avoid the access failures arising from the broken down of Authoritative Name servers, I'd like to run Stealth servers as back up. My question is how could I set the Stealth servers as non-priority so tha

Re: unable to obtain neither an IPv4 nor an IPv6 dispatch

At the moment I'm limited to using 2 UDP listeners per interface. When stress testing I can see that only 2 out of 4 CPUs are being used, I'm guessing because I'm limited to 2 listeners. Any suggestions for what could be limiting BIND from using a higher number of UDP listeners? On Fri, Jul 18, 2

Re: Process size versus cache size.

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote: > In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc > machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process > size increase due to the cache does not make sense. > > Over about a week the process size had grown

Process size versus cache size.

In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process size increase due to the cache does not make sense. Over about a week the process size had grown to 257 MB, up from an initial size of 36 MB. But when I dumped the cache