dhcp is only expected to work with the generic library (and also
disabling epoll), but this comment now seems to be obsolete as there's
no generic (formerly called export) version of the library.
Assuming the issue with epoll is somehow resolved, I suspect we'd need
some run-time mechanism to
On 02/19/2015 06:40 PM, 神明達哉 wrote:
At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:17:13 +0100,
Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com wrote:
We have been linking DHCP against separately built BIND in the past and
everything
worked for years. Only thing that changed is that we updated latest BIND
9.9 to latest 9.10.
Ah, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind contains links to the source
rpms, and build instructions.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlTmMrwACgkQL6j7milTFsG56gCfZBmkiO8rkThamB3mq9fpJLmk
At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:20:29 +0100,
Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com wrote:
But it's still not possible to stop them, one has to use 'kill -9'.
Any ideas ?
Hmm, that's beyond my experiments. (Do you mean you cannot terminate
them by SIGTERM?) Hopefully someone else has a clue.
--
JINMEI,
Hi all.
There's [1] a packaging policy on Fedora,
that packages can't be shipped with bundled libraries,
which is a case of BIND bundled in DHCP tarball.
We'd like to ship bind-9.10.2 dhcp-4.3.2 with next Fedora release (22).
Problem is, that dhclient/dhcpd don't play well with bind-9.10.
Jiri
Thank you for your reply.
On 02/19/2015 06:01 PM, 神明達哉 wrote:
At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:26:19 +0100,
Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com wrote:
There's [1] a packaging policy on Fedora,
that packages can't be shipped with bundled libraries,
which is a case of BIND bundled in DHCP tarball.
We'd
At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:26:19 +0100,
Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com wrote:
There's [1] a packaging policy on Fedora,
that packages can't be shipped with bundled libraries,
which is a case of BIND bundled in DHCP tarball.
We'd like to ship bind-9.10.2 dhcp-4.3.2 with next Fedora release (22).
At Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:17:13 +0100,
Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com wrote:
We have been linking DHCP against separately built BIND in the past and
everything
worked for years. Only thing that changed is that we updated latest BIND
9.9 to latest 9.10.
Ah, I realized I was probably not clear
Hi
I understand that I need the below snip in my /etc/named.conf
---snip ---
// Two corporate subnets we wish to allow queries from.
acl corpnets { 192.168.4.0/24; 192.168.7.0/24; };
options {
// Working directory
directory /etc/namedb;
allow-query { corpnets;
Hi all !
I'm having a problem guys, I want to know if there's a way to share RPZ
zones between views in a single server.
Let's say that I have a view common and I have in there a zone called
porn with all the domains that I want to block, then I have 2 views that
matches for 2 different IP
10 matches
Mail list logo