Am 30.01.2016 um 22:40 schrieb Grant Taylor:
On 01/30/2016 04:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
From RFC 1034 - Domain names - concepts and facilities:
Of course, by the robustness principle, domain software should not fail
when presented with CNAME chains or loops; CNAME chains should be
followed a
>If chained CNAMEs work for you, more power to you. But don't be
>surprised if they fail unexpectedly at some point.
If they don't, you'll have a lot of unhappy users since there's a
whole lot of the Internet they won't be able to see.
Try www.apple.com and www.microsoft.com, both of which ha
On 01/30/2016 04:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
nonsense
Okay ...
From RFC 1034 - Domain names - concepts and facilities:
Of course, by the robustness principle, domain software should not fail
when presented with CNAME chains or loops; CNAME chains should be
followed and CNAME loops signalled a
Am 30.01.2016 um 03:45 schrieb Grant Taylor:
On 01/26/2016 04:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
violating what?
Chaining CNAMEs is a violation according to RFCs.
nonsense
From RFC 1034 - Domain names - concepts and facilities:
Of course, by the robustness principle, domain software should not f
4 matches
Mail list logo