Am 04.02.2016 um 22:01 schrieb Mike Hoskins (michoski):
Do you really want to return RFC1918 to the Internet? Not the end of
the world, but some consider it unnecessary information disclosure. :-)
funny to read that from a @cisco.com sender when all the DNS mangeling
in the last deacde i h
Do you really want to return RFC1918 to the Internet? Not the end of the
world, but some consider it unnecessary information disclosure. :-)
I've seen this on various WAN/fw/router used at home over the years (arris,
cisco, linksys, etc) and unlike the commands Reindal shared which are geared
Am 04.02.2016 um 21:29 schrieb David Hornsby:
I am having an issue with an authoritative dns server that sits behind a
nat. I have replicated this problem on two different servers on
different versions of bind which is why I am now perplexed. In the zone
file the LAN address of the server has an
I am having an issue with an authoritative dns server that sits behind a nat. I
have replicated this problem on two different servers on different versions of
bind which is why I am now perplexed. In the zone file the LAN address of the
server has an A record. When the server is queried directly
4 matches
Mail list logo
