On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, at 11:18 AM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> Both things together are better than either one alone.
Thanks for the explanation.
upstream bind-chroot with systemd should be easier and better
documented
___
Please visit
On 25 April 2016 at 11:44, wrote:
>
>
>
> I completely gave up on chroot'd ntpd because of the endless weirdness.
> Finally just moved to openntpd as (1) it had safe privsep, (2) no chroot
> req'd, and (3) did the job I need.
>
Privsep doesn't actually fix the same
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Ali Jawad wrote:
> Hi Bob
> I did have a look at
> http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch7/rpz.html#policy-client-ip-trigger ,
> and while in theory it can be used in a way similar to ACL I cant see how
> it accommodates for faster changes,
Hi Bob
I did have a look at
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch7/rpz.html#policy-client-ip-trigger , and
while in theory it can be used in a way similar to ACL I cant see how it
accommodates for faster changes, would you please elaborate ?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Bob Harold
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Carl Byington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 23:23 +0300, Ali Jawad wrote:
> > based on a user tool the users "hundreds in corporate environment" get
> > either public or private zone,
>
>
5 matches
Mail list logo