On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
>
> this is a public mailing list - so what!
>
> when someone don't yet get the connection between nameservers, webserver
> and ip-addresses he is not ready to connect public servers and that's
> completly
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
> i don't understand your question
>>
>>
>> Since you have NOTHING to do with ISC or even remotely with bind, if you
>> dont understand , LEAVE IT TO SOMEONE WHO DOES
>>
>
> and YOU have something to do with ISC?
Am 24.10.2016 um 22:45 schrieb Nick Edwards:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Reindl Harald > wrote:
don't get me wrong but that question shows that you are not ready to
run a public dns server - there is no "local" or
when
Am 24.10.2016 um 22:42 schrieb Nick Edwards:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Reindl Harald > wrote:
identical like the first one
Which IP should be use?
i don't understand your question
Since you have NOTHING to do
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
>
>>
> don't get me wrong but that question shows that you are not ready to run a
> public dns server - there is no "local" or
>
when you make statements like that to be sure you include the fact you have
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
> identical like the first one
>
> Which IP should be use?
>>
>
> i don't understand your question
>
>
Since you have NOTHING to do with ISC or even remotely with bind, if you
dont understand , LEAVE IT TO SOMEONE
Ideally, whatever frontend you use to maintain the "forward" records for these
zones, should be smart enough to, in parallel, populate the corresponding
entries in the common reverse zone.
But, failing that, it shouldn't be that hard to write a script that
periodically pulls zone transfers of
Hi Tony the master res a your Zone and de reverse generate the consult for ip.
2016-10-24 9:00 GMT-03:00 :
> Send bind-users mailing list submissions to
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
W dniu 24.10.2016 o 19:24, Davis, Donald W pisze:
> Has anyone compiled bind-9.11 on AIX version 7.1? I have gcc
> installed. The first make failed with “nslookup.c:39:31: fatal error:
> readline/readline.h: No such file or directory”
>
> I installed the readline library and now is failing
Has anyone compiled bind-9.11 on AIX version 7.1? I have gcc installed. The
first make failed with "nslookup.c:39:31: fatal error: readline/readline.h: No
such file or directory"
I installed the readline library and now is failing with the following errors:
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined
named virtual hosts anybody - you can run thousands of domains on a
single IP
understood Harld :)
cheers
Pol
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
Am 24.10.2016 um 16:35 schrieb Pol Hallen:
so what are your real questions?
P.S.: you need more than one DNS server for a public domain which must
not run on the same network
I have to register some domains: example.com, example.ue, example.net,
exampe.org, etc.
on my server I've also
so what are your real questions?
P.S.: you need more than one DNS server for a public domain which must
not run on the same network
I have to register some domains: example.com, example.ue, example.net,
exampe.org, etc.
on my server I've also apache web and I'd like have internet site based
Am 24.10.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Pol Hallen:
Hello all, after weeks studying bind I'm here with a question:
I'd like have my own bind authority server for some domains. I just
configured my first zone (ie: www.example.org) with static IP of my DSL.
Everything works :-)
If I register another
Hello all, after weeks studying bind I'm here with a question:
I'd like have my own bind authority server for some domains. I just
configured my first zone (ie: www.example.org) with static IP of my DSL.
Everything works :-)
If I register another FQDN (ie: www.example.com) how can I set my
blrmaani wrote:
> On Sunday, October 23, 2016 at 2:56:37 PM UTC-7, blrmaani wrote:
> >
> > We have hosts in two different zones but use same subnet. Zone1 is
> > generated by Master1 and Zone2 is generated by Master2.
> >
> > Slave1 runs BIND and would like to merge the
Tom wrote:
>
> What's the reason, that it isn't necessary to run modern version of bind in a
> jail?
chroot is a defence against privilege escalation following a remote code
execution vulnerability. It isn't a very solid defence. And BIND 9 tends
to die of a self-check
17 matches
Mail list logo