Re: Sign zone escapes semicolon for RR 257 (CAA) and RR 256 (URI)

"\;" and ";" are the same thing on the wire. To get a '\' you need to to '\\'. RFC 1035 fails to properly describe a quoting mechanism that works as it leaves out details like to get a \ you need to escape the \ like \\. That said we can remove the backslash in this case. In message

Re: Providing GeoIP information for servers

In message <3cc295c2-1717-3af3-362a-66c708256...@htt-consult.com>, Robert Mosko witz writes: > > > On 05/10/2017 05:41 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message , Robert M > osko > > witz writes: > >> I am kind of tired in my systems being

RE: Providing GeoIP information for servers

>From the it-could-be-worse department: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/08/kansas-couple-sues-ip-mapping-firm-for-turning-their-life-into-a-digital-hell/ I am more a fan of continental geolocation accuracy when it comes to IP addresses. John

Re: Providing GeoIP information for servers

On 05/10/2017 05:41 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: In message , Robert Mosko witz writes: I am kind of tired in my systems being reported as being in Plymouth MI instead of Oak Park MI. That is the best Comcast seems to be willing to do for

Re: Providing GeoIP information for servers

In message , Robert Mosko witz writes: > I am kind of tired in my systems being reported as being in Plymouth MI > instead of Oak Park MI. That is the best Comcast seems to be willing to > do for where my IP addresses (which are static)

Providing GeoIP information for servers

I am kind of tired in my systems being reported as being in Plymouth MI instead of Oak Park MI. That is the best Comcast seems to be willing to do for where my IP addresses (which are static) reside. Is there anyway to provide location information for a server via DNS that would feed into

Sign zone escapes semicolon for RR 257 (CAA) and RR 256 (URI)

Hi, Whenever I try to sign a zone (using dnssec-signzone) with a CAA record in it that has a semicolon in the value part of the RDATA like the following RDATA: 0 issue ";" Bind escapes the semicolon so the signed zonefile wil have the following RDATA for the same CAA record: 0 issue "\;" Even

Re: inline-signing a zone that exists in two views

Gordon Messmer wrote: > > I'm happy that it's working, but it seems like it was fairly difficult to get > right. Am I doing an unusual thing? Yes, it is fiddly, and a relatively common problem - which is why in-view was introduced! > Is it considered best-practice (or