Re: Tuning suggestions for high-core-count Linux servers

2017-05-31 Thread Mathew Ian Eis
360k qps is actually quite good… the best I have heard of until now on EL was 180k [1]. There, it was recommended to manually tune the number of subthreads with the -U parameter. Since you’ve mentioned rmem/wmem changes, specifically you want to: 1. check for send buffer overflow; as indicated

Re: Tuning suggestions for high-core-count Linux servers

2017-05-31 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 31.05.2017 um 14:42 schrieb MURTARI, JOHN: Stuart, You didn't mention what OS you are using Subject: RE: Tuning suggestions for high-core-count Linux servers ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from

RE: Tuning suggestions for high-core-count Linux servers

2017-05-31 Thread MURTARI, JOHN
Stuart, You didn't mention what OS you are using, I assume some version of Linux. What you are seeing may not be a BIND limit, but the OS. One thing we noted with Redhat is that the kernel just couldn't keep up with the inbound UDP packets (queue overflow).The kernel does keep a

Tuning suggestions for high-core-count Linux servers

2017-05-31 Thread Browne, Stuart
Hi, I've been able to get my hands on some rather nice servers with 2 x 12 core Intel CPU's and was wondering if anybody had any decent tuning tips to get BIND to respond at a faster rate. I'm seeing that pretty much cpu count beyond a single die doesn't get any real improvement. I understand